California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1940

Introduced
1/25/18  
Introduced
1/25/18  
Refer
2/5/18  
Refer
2/5/18  
Report Pass
3/12/18  
Report Pass
3/12/18  
Refer
3/14/18  
Refer
3/14/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Refer
4/11/18  

Caption

Parole: reintegration credits.

Impact

The bill modifies existing parole laws by creating a system of reintegration credits that can reduce a parolee's time under supervision. Parolees can earn credits through various means, including completing accredited academic programs, vocational training, or participating in volunteering efforts. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is tasked with implementing the necessary regulations to support this initiative. The changes aim to improve parole outcomes and provide parolees with clearer pathways to success post-incarceration.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1940, introduced by Assembly Member McCarty, aims to enhance the reintegration process for parolees in California by allowing them to earn credits that reduce their parole term for completing educational, training, or treatment programs. This is intended to incentivize positive behaviors among parolees and facilitate their reintegration into society. Several provisions are included that allow for a more structured reintegration pathway focused on rehabilitation and personal development, while specific exceptions apply to sex offenders, who are ineligible for these credits.

Sentiment

The reception of AB 1940 has been generally positive among rehabilitation advocates and lawmakers who support criminal justice reform. Proponents view the bill as a necessary step toward supporting individuals in their transition from incarceration to community life. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders about the potential challenges in implementation, particularly in ensuring that the programs are accessible and genuinely beneficial for all parolees. The division in support reflects ongoing discussions about the balance between public safety and providing meaningful opportunities for rehabilitation.

Contention

While AB 1940 is largely seen as a forward-thinking initiative, notable points of contention include the exceptions made for certain classes of offenders, particularly those required to register as sex offenders. Critics argue that this distinction could undermine the bill's goals by removing incentives for a significant group of parolees who might benefit from reintegration programs. Furthermore, discussions about how to adequately monitor and verify participation in qualifying programs raise questions about the efficacy and fairness of the proposed credit system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB277

Parole: reintegration credits.

CA AB2342

Parole.

CA AB2250

Prisoners: reentry.

CA SB551

Corrections and rehabilitation: state policy.

IN HB1004

Department of correction.

CA AB2025

Mental illness and substance use disorder: restorative care program: pilot projects.

CA AB1233

State prisons: construction and renovation.

CA AB2730

Prisons: rehabilitation programs.