California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1950

Introduced
1/29/18  
Refer
2/8/18  
Report Pass
2/28/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Report Pass
4/19/18  
Refer
4/23/18  
Refer
4/23/18  
Failed
6/12/18  

Caption

Consumers: Internet privacy.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1950 would amend the Business and Professions Code and introduce new standards demanding rigorous verification processes for social media platforms. Under this bill, platforms would need to disclose their utilization of bots in their privacy policies and ensure that such accounts are tied to natural persons. This approach could significantly affect how advertising is conducted online, potentially leading to a decrease in fraudulent advertisements created by bots, while also placing a compliance burden on social media operators to maintain accurate account data.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1950, introduced by Assembly Member Levine, aims to enhance consumer privacy in relation to internet usage, specifically targeting social media platforms. The bill requires operators of social media websites with a physical presence in California to verify that accounts associated with automated tasks or bots are linked to actual individuals, ensuring that advertisements are not sold or displayed through non-human accounts. This legislative measure seeks to promote transparency and reduce misleading advertising practices prevalent in the online landscape by holding platforms accountable for the verification of accounts that engage in advertising operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1950 appears to be focused on strengthening consumer protection and privacy rights in the digital sphere. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step toward combating deceptive advertising practices and enhancing user trust in online interactions. However, there may also be concerns from some stakeholders in the tech industry regarding the feasibility of implementing these verification measures, raising questions about the balance between regulation and operational flexibility for social media companies.

Contention

One notable point of contention within the discussions surrounding AB 1950 may arise from the challenge of defining and enforcing the regulations regarding automated accounts. There are implications for how social media networks can operate and manage accounts that use automation, as well as potential conflicts with existing data privacy and digital marketing practices. The bill's provisions could lead to complications in maintaining the operative structure of advertising partnerships while ensuring compliance with the new privacy regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1018

Platform Accountability and Transparency Act.

CA SB753

CalServe.

CA AB3211

California Digital Content Provenance Standards.

CA AB1159

Student personal information.

CA AB1628

Social media platforms: electronic content management: controlled substances.

CA AB1465

Cannabis: consumption cafe/lounge license.

CA AB1008

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: personal information.

CA SB1223

Consumer privacy: sensitive personal information: neural data.