Local agencies: surplus land.
AB 2065 strengthens provisions related to the disposal of surplus land by local agencies, mandating that at least 15% of housing developed on such land must be affordable to low-income households if specific conditions are met. This includes cases where no agreement on price and terms has been reached with interested entities. The bill seeks to mitigate the housing crisis by ensuring that surplus government land is used for public benefit, particularly by increasing the availability of affordable housing units.
Assembly Bill 2065, introduced by Assembly Member Ting, seeks to amend existing regulations concerning the disposal of surplus land held by local agencies in California. The bill expands the definition of 'local agency' to include additional entities such as utility and park districts, alongside existing definitions that include cities and counties. This change aims to ensure that more local governmental entities fall under the regulations that govern how surplus land can be disposed of, specifically emphasizing the importance of making surplus properties available for affordable housing development and recreational use.
The sentiment surrounding AB 2065 is broadly supportive among advocates for affordable housing who view the bill as a necessary step towards addressing the housing crisis in California. Supporters emphasize the importance of transparency and accountability in land transactions at the local level. However, there are concerns raised about the feasibility of the mandated affordable housing requirements, particularly from local agencies facing budget constraints. Some stakeholders worry that the bill could lead to conflicts over land use priorities between housing needs and other local community interests.
The bill's requirements also introduce potential contention, particularly regarding how local agencies will handle the obligation to prioritize affordable housing in land transactions. Critics argue that the definitions and requirements set forth may burden local governments and lead to legal and logistical challenges in negotiation processes for land leases and sales. Furthermore, questions about compliance with the new regulations and accountability for ensuring affordable housing requirements are met could lead to increased scrutiny of local agency decisions.