California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2168

Introduced
2/12/18  
Introduced
2/12/18  
Refer
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/20/18  
Report Pass
3/20/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Report Pass
5/1/18  
Report Pass
5/1/18  
Refer
5/3/18  
Refer
5/3/18  
Refer
5/9/18  
Refer
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/19/18  
Report Pass
6/19/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  

Caption

Special education: teachers: grant program.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2168 will introduce a competitive grant program managed by the State Department of Education, which will allocate a one-time grant of $500,000 to entities with demonstrated expertise in teacher retention. Furthermore, the bill proposes an appropriation of $1.5 million to local educational agencies to develop infrastructure that supports mentorship for new special education teachers, thereby directly addressing the state's educational challenges in the sector. Existing laws ensuring free special education instruction remain unchanged, but this bill complements these by focusing on the teachers who deliver such services.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2168, introduced by Assembly Member Thurmond, aims to enhance the retention of special education teachers in California through the establishment of a comprehensive framework for training and supporting mentor teachers. This initiative is crucial as California faces an influx of new special education teachers, necessitating effective mentorship to foster their growth and commitment to the profession. The bill outlines a structured approach for creating local and regional networks that provide essential resources and training to support these teachers effectively.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding AB 2168 appears to be positive, highlighting a commitment to improving conditions for special education teachers in California. Proponents argue that by investing in mentorship, the state will not only retain qualified teachers but also enhance the quality of education for students with exceptional needs. Nonetheless, some stakeholders express cautious optimism, emphasizing the bill's dependency on the annual Budget Act for appropriations, which raises questions about sustainable funding and support for these initiatives in the long run.

Contention

Despite the bill's positive reception, some legislators and educational stakeholders highlight potential contentions regarding implementation. There are concerns that the success of the mentorship framework relies heavily on committed funding and that inadequate budget allocations may undermine the intended outcomes. Moreover, the bill's requirement for local educational agencies to utilize provided funds effectively to foster a robust mentorship structure presents a challenge that requires ongoing oversight and support.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2465

Pupil instruction: third-grade literacy: literacy grant program.

CA AB2565

School employees: professional development: mathematics and science.

CA AB2609

Teachers: California Scientist-to-Teacher Pathway Program.

CA AB1012

Bilingual education: bilingual and biliteracy program support and recognition.

CA SB720

Environmental education: environmental principles and concepts.

CA AB749

Youth Sports for All Act.

CA AB1684

Pupil literacy: statewide professional learning infrastructure.

CA AB2514

Pupil instruction: dual language programs: grant program.