California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2188

Introduced
2/12/18  
Introduced
2/12/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
3/23/18  
Report Pass
3/23/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/5/18  
Report Pass
4/5/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Refer
5/23/18  
Refer
5/23/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/31/18  
Engrossed
5/31/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/31/18  
Chaptered
9/26/18  
Chaptered
9/26/18  
Passed
9/26/18  

Caption

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures: advertisements.

Impact

The enactment of AB 2188 will significantly influence state laws related to political campaign financing. By establishing clearer guidelines for online advertisement disclosures, the bill intends to facilitate better public understanding of who orchestrates political campaigns through advertising. It specifically targets digital platforms, ensuring that the origins of funding for ads are easily traceable and adequately communicated to viewers, thereby enhancing compliance with existing political financing laws.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2188, introduced by Assemblymember Mullin, amends the Political Reform Act of 1974, focusing on campaign disclosure requirements for advertisements. The bill mandates specific disclosures for electronic media advertisements, including the requirement for the phrase 'Who funded this ad?' to be visible for the duration of the advertisement. Additionally, it allows for alternative phrases such as 'Paid for by' or 'Ad Paid for by' to fulfill this requirement. These modifications aim to enhance transparency regarding the funding of political advertisements, especially across various digital platforms.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2188 appears to be generally supportive among proponents of political disclosure and transparency. Advocates argue that improved disclosure practices reflect a commitment to accountability in political advertising. However, concerns have also been raised about the potential burden on smaller political committees and the implications for free speech, highlighting a tension between regulatory oversight and the rights of advertisers.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 2188 center on the administrative burden it may impose on smaller campaigns and committees. Critics fear that the increased requirements for disclosure could limit the ability of less-funded groups to compete on equal footing, raising questions about the balance of ensuring transparency and maintaining equitable access to advertising resources for all political entities. Additionally, the bill's provisions regarding penalties for non-compliance might discourage campaigning efforts among smaller organizations due to fear of punitive measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1798

Campaign disclosure: advertisements.

CA AB1217

Political Reform Act of 1974: electioneering and issue lobbying communications: disclosures.

CA AB864

Political Reform Act of 1974: disclosures.

CA SB921

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

CA AB2885

False campaign speech and online platform disclosures.