California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2197

Introduced
2/12/18  
Refer
2/26/18  
Refer
2/26/18  
Report Pass
3/21/18  
Report Pass
3/21/18  
Engrossed
4/5/18  
Engrossed
4/5/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Report Pass
5/15/18  
Report Pass
5/15/18  
Enrolled
5/21/18  
Enrolled
5/21/18  
Chaptered
6/1/18  
Chaptered
6/1/18  
Passed
6/1/18  

Caption

Custodial officers.

Impact

The enactment of AB 2197 allows custodial officers in Madera County to perform previously restricted law enforcement activities, thereby potentially enhancing the operational capacity of local detention facilities. The bill acknowledges Madera County's unique circumstances, justifying the need for a specific statute to empower custodial officers adequately. This amendment not only empowers local officers but also clarifies their role and responsibilities to maintain custody effectively and ensure the security of the local detention environment.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2197, introduced by Assemblymember Bigelow, amends Section 831.5 of the Penal Code, particularly focusing on custodial officers in California counties with populations of 425,000 or less. The bill specifically adds the County of Madera as a jurisdiction where custodial officers are authorized to perform certain law enforcement duties, including making arrests, conducting searches, and classifying prisoners under the supervision of the local Board of Supervisors. This aligns Madera County's regulations with those of other counties, such as Napa County, enhancing operational uniformity in law enforcement procedures across similar jurisdictions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2197 appears to be supportive, particularly among local law enforcement bodies and legislators who view it as a necessary adaptation to meet the unique needs of Madera County. Proponents argue that it strengthens law enforcement capabilities at the local level while maintaining public safety. Critics, if any, have not prominently surfaced in discussions, indicating a general consensus or lack of opposition disadvantages to this localized specification of custodial officer authority.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as beneficial, there may be underlying concerns regarding the potential for overreach in custodial officer powers. It is essential to ensure that while custodial officers are empowered to conduct arrests and searches, this does not compromise the oversight necessary to maintain public trust in law enforcement. The bill aims to reassure that such duties will be executed in accordance with existing training protocols and standards set by state regulations, which require custodial officers to complete specific training before undertaking these responsibilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1090

County officers: sheriffs.

CA SB852

Searches: supervised persons.

CA SB824

Criminal fees.

CA AB1869

Criminal fees.

CA SB667

Healing arts: pregnancy and childbirth.

CA SB1012

The Regulated Psychedelic Facilitators Act and the Regulated Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Act.

CA SB761

Department of Justice: civil rights investigations.

CA SB144

Criminal fees.