Defense: property used for defense.
The proposed change in the notification period reflects an effort to strengthen public engagement in the decision-making process that can affect both property owners involved in defense activities and the surrounding community. By requiring additional notice time, AB2399 is designed to ensure that local residents and stakeholders are adequately informed and have the opportunity to participate in discussions about the implications of restricting access to nearby public highways. This amendment may improve transparency and ensure that community voices are heard in matters that impact local access and safety.
Assembly Bill 2399, introduced by Assembly Member Voepel, seeks to amend Section 1654 of the Military and Veterans Code by changing the notification period required for public hearings regarding the closure or restriction of highways adjacent to properties used for defense purposes. Under existing law, a property owner who believes their defense-related property is threatened by public use can petition local highway commissioners to restrict access. Currently, the law requires that notice of such hearings be published at least 7 days before the meeting. AB2399 proposes to extend this notice period to 14 days, allowing for greater public awareness and input on potential highway restrictions that affect traffic and local communities.
While the bill appears to strengthen procedural transparency, it may face some contention related to the balance between public interests and defense needs. Proponents of the bill may assert that longer notice periods enhance community participation, whereas opponents might argue that extending notification could delay necessary restrictions that are critical for defense-related activities. The legislative discourse around AB2399 may reveal varying perspectives on the importance of public input versus operational confidentiality in defense matters.