California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2422

Introduced
2/14/18  
Introduced
2/14/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
3/23/18  
Report Pass
3/23/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Refer
4/11/18  

Caption

Pesticides: use of anticoagulants.

Impact

The anticipated impact of this bill is significant in altering existing pesticide regulations. By prohibiting the use of anticoagulant pesticides entirely, the bill seeks to protect native wildlife species, including various endangered species, from the harmful effects of these substances. The legislation could also prompt a change in pest management practices across the state, pushing for more environmentally friendly and wildlife-compatible pest control methods, while potentially leading to increased oversight and regulations imposed on pest control businesses and agricultural sectors.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2422, introduced by Assembly Member Bloom, addresses the regulation of anticoagulant pesticides in California. The bill proposes to expand the prohibition of any pesticide containing anticoagulants to include all areas of the state, following concerns over their impact on wildlife and public health. Currently, existing laws prohibit the use of such pesticides in wildlife habitat areas but allow exceptions for agricultural activities. AB2422 aims to strengthen these restrictions by requiring that any application for the use of such pesticides must demonstrate that all alternative pest control methods have been exhausted before approval can be granted by the Department of Pesticide Regulation.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB2422 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates and wildlife protection groups, who argue that it is necessary to safeguard California's biodiversity and public health. However, there may be contention from those within agricultural sectors and pest control professions who may perceive this as an overreach that restricts effective pest management options. This duality represents a complex discussion surrounding environmental health and agricultural productivity, requiring careful consideration of both human and ecological needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the practicality and implications of enforcing such a prohibition. Questions arise regarding how the bill will impact pest management strategies and whether it could lead to unintended consequences, such as pest population explosions due to lack of effective control. Additionally, the bill specifies that in cases of public health emergencies related to pest infestations, exceptions may be made, which introduces a layer of complexity in applying and enforcing these regulations. The requirements for qualifying applicators emphasize both responsibility and procedural diligence in emergency situations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1788

Pesticides: use of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides.

CA AB1322

Pesticides: second-generation anticoagulant rodenticide: diphacinone.

CA AB2552

Pesticides: anticoagulant rodenticides.