California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2476

Introduced
2/14/18  
Introduced
2/14/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Engrossed
4/19/18  
Engrossed
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
5/3/18  
Refer
5/3/18  
Report Pass
5/15/18  
Report Pass
5/15/18  
Refer
5/15/18  

Caption

Health and care facilities.

Impact

The implementation of AB 2476 is poised to have a significant impact on the licensing and operational framework for various health facilities in California. Under this legislation, existing regulations that were in effect as of December 31, 1977, will no longer apply, and instead, stricter federal standards will take precedence until the State Department of Public Health develops new regulations. This shift places a greater emphasis on compliance and accountability, while significantly changing how health facilities operate under state law.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2476, introduced by Assembly Member Rubio, seeks to amend and update regulations surrounding health and care facilities in California, specifically targeting chronic dialysis, surgical, and rehabilitation clinics. This bill mandates that these clinics comply with specific federal certification standards that were in effect prior to the beginning of 2018. The aim is to ensure that these facilities provide uniformly high-quality services in line with federal requirements, promoting consistency across healthcare provisions in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2476 appears to be largely positive among proponents who emphasize the necessity for higher regulatory standards and improved public safety in health facilities. Supporters argue that aligning state regulations with federal standards will enhance care quality for patients across various medical settings. However, there are concerns regarding the financial implications for clinics and the potential burden placed on local agencies to adapt to these changes without state reimbursement for compliance costs.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention related to AB 2476 is the provision that no reimbursement will be required for local agencies due to the creation of new crime definitions or changes in penalties resulting from this act. Critics may view this as a financial strain on local governments and agencies, potentially leading to deficits in local health services during the transition to the new regulations. The urgency clause indicating the immediate effect of the legislation further adds complexity to the legislative discourse, highlighting the need for expedited enforcement of federal standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB211

Department of Motor Vehicles: Modernizing Government Technology Act of 2018.

CA AB251

Bar pilots: pilotage rates.

AZ HB2166

DHS; licensure; group homes

WV HB3247

Relating to abuse and or neglect of individuals with an intellectual and or developmental disability

CA AB994

Health care districts: design-build.

CA AB248

Individuals with disabilities: The Dignity for All Act.

CA SB1423

Medi-Cal: Rural Hospital Technical Advisory Group.

AZ SB1308

DHS licensure; group homes