California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB258

Introduced
1/31/17  
Introduced
1/31/17  
Refer
2/13/17  
Report Pass
2/23/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Report Pass
3/6/17  
Report Pass
3/6/17  
Refer
3/7/17  
Refer
3/7/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
6/27/17  
Report Pass
6/27/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/13/17  
Refer
7/13/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
10/12/17  
Chaptered
10/12/17  
Passed
10/12/17  

Caption

Child care and development services: individualized county child care subsidy plan: County of Fresno.

Impact

If enacted, AB 258 is set to create frameworks that enable the County of Fresno to allocate state child care funding in a manner that supports local demographics and families. Affected families include those with varying needs, such as access to after-hours care and services for children with exceptional needs. The bill stipulates that the county must report annually on the plan's effectiveness, including metrics such as enrollment increases. Such measures aim to enhance both the overall quality and availability of child care across Fresno, which is essential for working families who depend on these services.

Summary

Assembly Bill 258, introduced by Arambula, proposes to develop an individualized county child care subsidy plan specifically for the County of Fresno. This bill stems from the recognition of unique fiscal challenges faced by residents in Fresno, particularly regarding access to quality child care. The bill allows the county to tailor its subsidy plan in a way that aligns with local needs and conditions, which the current state regulations may not adequately address. It emphasizes the necessity for a more responsive approach to funding and support for families, in light of high poverty levels in the area, alongside the rising operational costs of child care services due to minimum wage increases.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 258 appears largely supportive, especially among grassroots movements advocating for better child care access in low-income communities. Proponents view this legislation as a critical step towards ensuring that local policies can better meet families' unique requirements, contrasting with one-size-fits-all approaches that may not translate effectively across diverse communities. Critics, however, may question the viability of the county's management of such a plan and whether it could lead to inconsistencies in funding and support compared to state-level structures.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the balance between local control and regulatory compliance with state standards. The bill suggests that Fresno could supersede certain state laws relating to child care subsidies, such as eligibility criteria, fee structures, and reimbursement rates. This raises concerns among some critics about the potential for reduced oversight and equity in care across California if localities have too much leeway in implementing these subsidy plans. The temporary pilot nature of the program, set to be repealed on January 1, 2023, without further legislative action, adds another layer of urgency and complexity to its potential impact on state laws.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB377

Child care subsidy plans: Counties of San Diego and Solano.

CA AB435

Child care subsidy plans: Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, and Sonoma.

CA AB300

Child care and development services: individualized county child care subsidy plans: Counties of Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz.