California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2602

Introduced
2/15/18  
Introduced
2/15/18  
Refer
3/15/18  
Refer
3/15/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/25/18  
Refer
6/25/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/27/18  
Enrolled
8/27/18  
Vetoed
9/26/18  

Caption

Homeless youth emergency service projects.

Impact

The addition of the Sacramento project is intended to enhance the framework provided by previous laws that already cover a significant portion of California's urban centers dealing with youth homelessness. The new project will require the office to prepare and disseminate a request for proposal and commence operations on a specified timeline which emphasizes the urgency of addressing youth homelessness. Notably, the bill specifies that the implementation of this new project will not diminish the funding allocated to existing service programs in the other participating counties, aiming to maintain service levels across the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2602, introduced by Assembly Member McCarty, seeks to amend Section 13703 of the Welfare and Institutions Code to establish an additional homeless youth emergency service project in the County of Sacramento. The bill aims to expand current services provided in counties such as Los Angeles, Santa Clara, San Diego, and San Francisco, ensuring that homeless youth have access to crucial resources including food, overnight shelter, counseling for emotional crises, and screening for basic health needs. This legislative change would involve the California Office of Emergency Services in monitoring these programs and ensuring they meet the necessary service requirements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2602 appears to be largely positive among proponents who view the bill as a necessary expansion of support services for a vulnerable segment of the population. There is a recognition that additional resources must be allocated to effectively tackle issues of youth homelessness, especially in urban areas that continue to struggle with this persistent issue. However, as with any funding bill, there may be concerns from stakeholders about the allocation of resources and the efficacy of monitoring and evaluation processes which could spark debate on how best to implement such services.

Contention

While AB 2602 is focused on expanding services, potential areas of contention might arise regarding the criteria for agencies to receive grants and the effectiveness of services offered. Critics may question the adequacy of funds or the methodology used to evaluate agencies applying for funding, especially in light of varied effectiveness in service delivery among nonprofits. There could also be concerns regarding the geographic focus of services, ensuring that they adequately meet the diverse needs of homeless youth across different communities in Sacramento.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB984

Personal income taxes: voluntary contributions: Suicide Prevention Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA AB589

Homeless youth: transitional housing.

CA SB175

Budget Act of 2022.

CA AB175

Housing: mortgages and deeds of trust: use of state property: surplus land disposal: financing programs.

CA AB1735

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA SB1417

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA AB1738

Mobile Homeless Connect Pilot Program.