California Assembly Bill AB2611

California 2017-2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/18
• Refer: 3/22/18
• Report Pass: 3/22/18
• Refer: 4/2/18

Caption

Residential property insurance.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2611 would enhance consumer protection by ensuring that individuals are aware of the specific reasons behind adverse underwriting decisions. The bill requires insurers to provide this information promptly if a decision goes against the applicant or insured, allowing them to seek a review by the Department of Insurance. This would amend how the state's insurance laws currently function, particularly in regard to wildfire risk assessments that directly influence a homeowner's insurance policy and premiums.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2611, introduced by Assembly Member Obernolte, aims to amend the Insurance Code concerning residential property insurance. The bill focuses on establishing an appeal process for insured individuals or applicants who disagree with an insurer's decision when using a wildfire risk model to determine insurance coverage or premiums. This legislation comes in response to the growing concern over how insurers assess risk, particularly in areas susceptible to wildfires, thus providing an avenue for homeowners to contest unfavorable decisions from insurers.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 2611 appears cautiously optimistic, particularly among homeowners and consumer advocates who see this bill as a step towards greater transparency and fairness in the insurance industry. However, there may be opposition from some insurance companies that could argue the bill complicates underwriting processes and increases their administrative burdens when handling appeals, thereby impacting their operations and profitability.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 2611 include the balance between consumer rights and the operational realities of insurance companies. Critics may express concerns that establishing a formal appeal process could lead to increased litigation or disputes, while supporters emphasize the importance of providing consumers with a meaningful way to challenge their insurers' decisions, especially in the context of increasing wildfire risks. The legislative discussions surrounding this bill highlight the imperative of developing a fair framework that adequately addresses both consumer needs and the capabilities of insurance providers.