California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2615

Introduced
2/15/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Report Pass
3/21/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Refer
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Refer
6/25/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Chaptered
9/18/18  
Chaptered
9/18/18  
Passed
9/18/18  

Caption

State highway system: parks and recreation: accessibility for bicycles and pedestrians.

Impact

The introduction of AB 2615 is expected to have a positive impact on state laws related to transportation and public health. By promoting partnerships among public agencies, the bill could lead to enhanced pathways and crossings that facilitate safer access to recreational areas. Such improvements may also reduce reliance on automobiles for short trips, potentially contributing to lower traffic congestion and environmental benefits. The bill reflects a growing recognition of the need for integrated planning that considers the needs of all road users, including cyclists and pedestrians.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2615 focuses on enhancing accessibility for bicycles and pedestrians to parks adjacent to or connected to the state highway system in California. The bill mandates that the Department of Transportation collaborate with various public agencies, including local and regional entities, to develop effective strategies and plans aimed at improving this accessibility. This initiative seeks to create a more inclusive transportation infrastructure, encouraging active transportation and outdoor recreation among all citizens, particularly in urban and suburban areas where access may be limited.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 2615 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for active transportation and public health. Proponents emphasize the importance of safe and accessible routes for non-motorized users, arguing that this not only supports public health objectives but also enhances community connection to natural spaces. However, there may be some contention from stakeholders concerned about funding and resource allocation for the implementation of these initiatives, as well as the challenge of coordinating among various governmental levels.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as a progressive step toward improving infrastructure, some critics express concerns about its feasibility and the potential costs associated with developing new pathways and pedestrian facilities. The requirement for collaboration among multiple public agencies may also present logistical challenges, causing delays in execution. Nevertheless, the consensus among advocates is that the long-term benefits of improved accessibility for bicycles and pedestrians greatly outweigh the initial hurdles that may arise during implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1492

Employment: Telecommuting Act.

CA AB2259

Transportation: bicycle safety handbook.

CA AB1188

Transportation: bicycle safety handbook.

CO HB1044

Local Funding for Vulnerable Road User Protection

CA AB314

Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program: project eligibility.

CA SB960

Transportation: planning: complete streets facilities: transit priority facilities.

NJ S2885

Establishes "New Jersey Target Zero Commission."

NJ A4296

Establishes "New Jersey Target Zero Commission."