Hiring of real property: Department of Consumer Affairs: landlords and property managers: training.
The legislation seeks to enhance tenant protections by ensuring that landlords and property managers are educated on critical housing laws, including the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. This requirement for certification is viewed as a significant step toward professionalizing the property management field and reducing instances of malpractice or discrimination in housing. By imposing education and certification requirements, AB 2618 aims to foster a culture of compliance among landlords, which can lead to improved relationships between tenants and property owners.
Assembly Bill 2618 requires the Department of Real Estate Consumer Affairs in California to administer a certification program for landlords and property managers. The program is designed to provide education on fair housing practices, landlord responsibilities, and tenant rights. The intent behind this legislation is to ensure that individuals managing rental properties are adequately informed about their legal obligations, which aims to create a more equitable rental market in the state. The bill specifies that landlords and property managers must obtain this certification to operate legally after the implementation date of January 1, 2020.
The sentiment surrounding Assembly Bill 2618 is largely supportive from tenant advocacy groups, who see it as a necessary measure to safeguard tenant rights and enhance housing equity. However, some landlords and property management companies have expressed concerns regarding the additional regulatory burden and costs associated with the certification process. The debate has highlighted a need for balance between enhancing tenant protections and ensuring that landlords can operate their businesses effectively without excessive regulatory hurdles.
Notable points of contention regarding AB 2618 hinge on the compliance mechanisms and penalties for non-compliance. While supporters argue that requiring certification will ultimately protect tenants, critics point out that the enforcement of penalties against landlords who fail to comply could create undue stress for smaller property owners who might struggle with the costs associated with the certification and educational coursework. The contrasting perspectives underscore the ongoing tensions in California's housing policy landscape.