California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2658

Introduced
2/15/18  
Introduced
2/15/18  
Refer
3/15/18  
Refer
3/15/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/4/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Report Pass
5/8/18  
Report Pass
5/8/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Refer
5/16/18  
Refer
5/16/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/27/18  
Enrolled
8/27/18  
Chaptered
9/28/18  
Chaptered
9/28/18  
Passed
9/28/18  

Caption

Secretary of the Government Operations Agency: working group: blockchain technology.

Impact

The establishment of this working group is intended to foster a comprehensive understanding of blockchain's applicability within state operations, aiming to promote greater efficiency, transparency, and potentially innovation in public and private sectors alike. The findings and recommendations from the working group, due to be reported by July 1, 2020, are expected to inform future legislative actions and potential regulatory updates concerning the deployment of blockchain technology in California. This endeavor could significantly reshape data handling, financial transactions, and contract enforcement in the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2658, introduced by Calderon, establishes a framework for the adoption and evaluation of blockchain technology within California's state government and by California-based businesses. The bill mandates the creation of a working group under the Secretary of the Government Operations Agency, tasked with assessing the potential applications, risks, and benefits of blockchain technology. This includes addressing legal implications and best practices for deploying blockchain solutions to enhance governmental operations and business efficiencies in California.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 2658 is generally positive among supporters who view it as a significant step towards modernizing state operations and embracing new technological advancements. However, there are concerns, particularly related to privacy and security, as the move towards digital record-keeping and electronic transactions raises questions about data protection and the integrity of sensitive information. Stakeholders are keenly awaiting the recommendations from the working group to assure that the implementation of blockchain aligns with high privacy standards.

Contention

Notably, the bill's debate highlights potential contention over balancing technological advancement with safeguarding privacy rights. Critics might argue that rushing into blockchain adoption without thorough oversight could expose vulnerabilities in sensitive governmental processes. Hence, ensuring that the working group includes diverse stakeholders—including technologists, privacy advocates, and legal experts—is essential for achieving a well-rounded perspective that addresses both innovation and ethical considerations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB689

Records: blockchain.

MA H88

Establishing a special commission on blockchain and cryptocurrency

MA H69

Establishing a special commission on blockchain and cryptocurrency

MA S29

Establishing a special commission on blockchain and cryptocurrency

MA S38

Resolve establishing a special commission on blockchain and cryptocurrency technology

CA SB711

Community colleges: blockchain industry report.

MA S707

Relative to preventing fraud and establishing regulations on certain virtual currencies

MA H1247

Relative to preventing fraud and establishing regulations on certain virtual currencies