California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2677

Introduced
2/15/18  
Introduced
2/15/18  
Refer
3/19/18  
Refer
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Refer
3/20/18  

Caption

Deposition notices.

Impact

The proposed amendments to AB 2677 will have implications for existing wildlife protection laws in California, particularly around how individuals can own tortoises deemed protected species. By formally clarifying the regulations for possession, it is anticipated that the bill will reduce confusion among tortoise owners regarding legal requirements, thereby promoting proper pet ownership practices while also emphasizing the importance of wildlife conservation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2677, introduced by Assembly Member Mark Stone, aims to amend Section 5001 of the Fish and Game Code concerning the possession of tortoises. The bill addresses the current regulations that make it unlawful to sell, purchase, harm, take, transport, or shoot tortoises. The existing law allows for an exemption for individuals who can prove their tortoise was legally acquired and possessed prior to January 1, 1973. This bill seeks to clarify this exemption without making substantive changes to the law, thereby ensuring that there is a clear process for tortoise ownership under specific conditions.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 2677 appears to be neutral, as the amendments are largely technical and nonsubstantive. However, they do indicate a recognition of the longstanding legal ownership issues related to tortoises. While most support seems to stem from a desire to clarify the law and support responsible ownership, there may be underlying concerns from wildlife advocates about the implications of easing possession restrictions, emphasizing the need to balance personal ownership rights with conservation efforts.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from wildlife conservation groups who are concerned that any modification of possession laws could lead to increased pressure on tortoise populations if ownership is perceived as becoming more acceptable. The bill's supporters argue that clarifying the law is essential for existing owners, but critics may warn against potential risks of making ownership feel less restrictive, thus impacting wild populations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3019

Deposition notices.

CA AB1189

Court reporting: digital reporters and legal transcriptionists.

TX HB332

Relating to grand jury proceedings.

CA AB424

Depositions: audio or video recordings.

TX HB5564

Relating to grand jury proceedings; providing a punishment for contempt of court.

TX HB179

Relating to grand jury proceedings; providing a punishment for contempt of court.

TX HB1258

Relating to grand jury proceedings; providing a punishment for contempt of court.

TX HB3362

Relating to grand jury proceedings; providing a punishment for contempt of court.