California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2734

Introduced
2/15/18  
Introduced
2/15/18  
Refer
3/15/18  
Refer
3/15/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Enrolled
8/14/18  
Enrolled
8/14/18  

Caption

California Transportation Commission.

Impact

The implications of AB 2734 are significant for state laws governing transportation governance. By establishing the CTC as an independent entity, the bill aims to reinforce the commission's ability to provide impartial oversight of transportation matters, including funding allocations and project priorities. This would ensure that transportation decisions are made with greater transparency and accountability, ultimately benefiting the public by improving transportation infrastructure and services across California.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2734 seeks to amend sections of the Government Code related to the structure and functioning of the California Transportation Commission (CTC). The bill proposes to exclude the CTC from the existing Transportation Agency framework, thereby establishing it as an independent entity within state government. This change is expected to enhance the CTC's capacity to execute its oversight responsibilities in an unbiased manner, away from the potential influences of the Transportation Agency's other departments.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 2734 has been positive, with many stakeholders recognizing the importance of having an independent oversight body for transportation. Supporters include various government officials and transportation advocates who believe that an independent CTC can better represent the interests of Californians. However, some concerns were raised regarding the potential disruption to existing operations within the Transportation Agency, indicating a need for a careful transition to ensure continued efficiency.

Contention

Notably, there were discussions concerning the balance of power between the CTC and the Transportation Agency. Some proponents argue that this separation could lead to more focused and effective governance in transportation, while others caution against the risks of bureaucratic isolation, which could complicate inter-departmental collaboration on transportation initiatives. The debate highlights the ongoing tension in state governance regarding autonomy versus integration within functional agencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1260

High-speed rail: independent review: High-Speed Rail Authority Inspector General.

CA SB1374

State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program: assessments and forecasts: integrated energy policy report.

CA AB380

Office of the Transportation Inspector General.

CA AB33

Autonomous vehicles.

CA ABX21

Energy: transportation fuels: inventories: turnaround and maintenance.

CA AB406

Energy: transportation fuels assessment.

CA SB950

Energy: transportation fuels: inventories: turnaround and maintenance.

CA SBX12

Energy: transportation fuels: supply and pricing: maximum gross gasoline refining margin.