California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2741

Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Report Pass
5/2/18  
Engrossed
5/7/18  
Engrossed
5/7/18  
Refer
5/7/18  
Refer
5/7/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Report Pass
5/24/18  
Report Pass
5/24/18  
Refer
5/24/18  
Refer
5/24/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  

Caption

Prescription drugs: opioid medications: minors.

Impact

If passed, AB 2741 could significantly affect the way healthcare practitioners prescribe opioids to minors in California. It aims to prevent excessive prescribing practices that have contributed to a nationwide opioid crisis. By requiring prescribers to evaluate the necessity of opioid therapy and engage caregivers in the decision-making process, the bill is intended to mitigate the risk of addiction and promote safer prescribing practices for vulnerable populations, such as minors. Violations of the bill’s provisions would classify as unprofessional conduct, leading to potential disciplinary actions against prescribers by their respective licensing boards.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2741, introduced by Assembly Member Burke, focuses on regulating the prescription of opioid medications to minors. The bill, which amends the Business and Professions Code, limits the prescription of opioid medications to a maximum of a five-day supply for minors, with specific exceptions such as cancer pain management, palliative care, and treatment for substance use disorders. Under the proposed legislation, prescribers must also discuss the risks associated with opioid usage and obtain verbal consent from a parent or guardian before prescribing, contributing to a more responsible approach to pain management in younger patients.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2741 appears predominantly supportive among public health advocates, given the context of the opioid epidemic. Supporters argue that the bill strikes an essential balance between managing pain effectively and preventing the risks of dependency among young patients. However, there may be concerns among certain medical professionals regarding the limitations placed on their prescribing capabilities, which could spark debates about managing acute or chronic pain effectively while following the stipulations of the bill. Overall, the discussions reflect an acknowledgment of the pressing need for preventative measures in opioid prescribing.

Contention

The notable points of contention surrounding AB 2741 include the balance between necessary pain management and the risk of opioid dependency. Some healthcare providers might argue that the restrictions could impede their ability to provide adequate pain relief for minors who require longer-term opioid therapy. Additionally, there might be discussions on what constitutes 'appropriate' pain management, particularly in pediatric medicine, where pain management approaches often vary greatly. The exceptions outlined in the bill are also crucially debated to ensure they encompass all the scenarios where opioids may be essential for effective treatment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2564

Hospitals; physicians; dispensing opioids

AZ HB2468

Unprofessional conduct; health professionals

AZ HB2174

School personnel; emergency glucagon administration

AZ SB1649

School personnel; emergency glucagon administration

AZ SB1535

School personnel; emergency glucagon administration.

AZ HB2134

Physician assistants; qualifications

CA AB1130

Substance use disorder.

AZ SB1440

Epinephrine delivery systems