Veterans: Internal Audits for Veterans Affairs.
Beginning January 1, 2020, the chief auditor is required to submit annual reports to the California Veterans Board and relevant legislative committees. These reports will summarize the audit activities of the office and provide recommendations aimed at improving the performance of veterans programs. Furthermore, the chap auditor is granted the authority to receive complaints from individuals who suspect wrongdoing within veterans programs, thereby establishing a system for accountability and transparency regarding the management of public resources allocated to veterans.
Assembly Bill No. 2790, introduced by Assembly Member Irwin, establishes the Office of Internal Audits for Veterans Affairs within the California Department of Veterans Affairs. The bill mandates the appointment of a chief auditor, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate, who will oversee audits and investigations into the operations and financial condition of California veterans homes and various veterans programs including the farm and home purchase programs. The intent of the bill is to enhance the efficiency of departmental operations while reducing fraud, waste, and abuse in veterans services.
The general sentiment surrounding AB 2790 is one of support within the legislative community, particularly among those prioritizing veterans' welfare and program accountability. Advocates argue that the establishment of this auditing body is crucial for maintaining oversight and ensuring that resources are utilized effectively. However, some concerns have been raised about potential bureaucratic expansion and the handling of sensitive information, given the provisions related to confidentiality in reporting misconduct.
One notable point of contention with AB 2790 is the potential for the bill to limit public access to certain information regarding the operations of veterans programs, tied to the confidentiality clauses for the reports of wrongdoing made to the chief auditor. While the intent is to protect whistleblowers, critics argue that this may also insulate the department from necessary public scrutiny, leading to a lack of transparency in how veterans services are managed.