California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2810

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
4/5/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Report Pass
4/12/18  
Report Pass
4/12/18  
Refer
4/12/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  

Caption

Cannabis: cultivation licenses: Sun-Grown Cannabis Commission and Indoor-Grown Cannabis Commission.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2810 would significantly modify the current landscape for cannabis cultivation in California. it would allow the commissions to levy assessments on cultivators while also establishing penalties for non-compliance with reporting provisions. The bill emphasizes the importance of accurate reporting and adherence to state regulations, thus fostering a more accountable and transparent market structure. Additionally, it facilitates the collection and dissemination of market price information to prevent unfair trade practices, enhancing the financial stability for those involved in cannabis cultivation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2810 aims to establish regulatory frameworks for the cannabis cultivation industries in California, specifically focusing on the creation of the Sun-Grown Cannabis Commission and the Indoor-Grown Cannabis Commission. The bill authorizes the commissions to oversee various aspects of cannabis cultivation, including market regulation, research on the impacts of local and state regulations, and the establishment of assessment rates to fund the commissions' activities. With the increasing importance of cannabis in California's agricultural economy, the bill seeks to provide a structured approach to managing the industry.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards AB 2810 is mixed. Supporters in the agricultural sector view the creation of the commissions as a positive step for the cannabis industry, creating clarity and professionalism in its regulation. However, there are also concerns regarding the potential bureaucratic burden this might impose on smaller cultivators and the implications of penalties for violations. The need for cultivators to vote in favor of these provisions may also introduce uncertainty regarding the bill's practical implementation.

Contention

The primary points of contention surrounding AB 2810 include the scope of the commissions' authority and the implications of the assessments on cultivators. Some stakeholders fear that the introduction of severe civil penalties for non-compliance may disproportionately affect smaller growers who may struggle with regulatory compliance. Furthermore, the bill's requirement for cultivators to approve the provisions before they go into effect could lead to significant delays in establishing the much-needed oversight framework for the cannabis industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB858

Cannabis: cultivation.

CA AB1678

Indoor-Grown Cannabis Commission.

CA AB243

California Beef Commission.

CA SB965

California Cattle Council.

CA AB944

California Spiny Lobster Commission.

CA AB1472

Personal rights: false reports to law enforcement.

CA AB239

Avocado oil: regulations: standards of identity.