California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2894

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
3/23/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Report Pass
5/16/18  
Report Pass
5/16/18  
Engrossed
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/25/18  
Refer
5/25/18  
Refer
5/25/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Enrolled
8/22/18  
Enrolled
8/22/18  
Chaptered
9/11/18  
Chaptered
9/11/18  
Passed
9/11/18  

Caption

Postsecondary education: students called to active military duty during an academic term.

Impact

The bill could lead to substantial changes in state educational laws by redistributing funds to prioritize equity. It may modify existing funding formulas to allow for more targeted support, effectively redirecting state resources to areas that have been historically underfunded. This change could enhance local school districts’ capabilities to improve facilities, hire qualified staff, and offer diverse educational programs, ultimately fostering better student outcomes in disadvantaged areas.

Summary

AB2894 seeks to reform the funding mechanisms for education within the state, focusing on increasing financial support for underfunded districts. The bill aims to address disparities in educational resources by providing additional funds based on need, which could significantly impact how local schools operate and enhance educational equity. Proponents argue that this measure is crucial to ensure all students have access to quality education, regardless of their socio-economic background.

Sentiment

Sentiment around AB2894 is largely supportive among educational advocates and several Democratic lawmakers, who view it as a step toward leveling the playing field for students. However, some resistance has emerged from fiscal conservatives who express concerns over the potential strain on the state's budget and the implications for local control over education funding. This division underscores broader ideological debates about the role of state versus local governance in service provision.

Contention

Notable points of contention include arguments about the adequacy of current funding mechanisms and debates over the long-term sustainability of increased educational spending. Opponents warn that while the intentions behind the bill are commendable, it may inadvertently lead to increased reliance on state funding, potentially compromising local autonomy in decision-making regarding educational priorities. The legislative discussions reflect a broader concern about finding the appropriate balance between equitable educational support and maintaining local governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1346

Public postsecondary education: residency: dependents of members of the Armed Forces: reenrollments.

CA AB1611

Private postsecondary education.

CA AB365

Pupil instruction: coursework and graduation requirements: children of military families.

CA AB1172

Special education: nonpublic, nonsectarian schools or agencies.

LA SB140

Provides active duty military members, qualified veterans, or the spouses and dependent children of certain military members with an education benefit. (gov sig)

LA SB132

Provides for the reverse transfer of academic credits and the award of certain credits to veterans and their spouses. (gov sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

CA AB2121

Pupil instruction: coursework and graduation requirements: migratory children and newly arrived immigrant pupils.

CA AB1527

Postsecondary education: associate degrees for transfer.