California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB290

Introduced
2/2/17  
Introduced
2/2/17  
Refer
2/13/17  
Refer
2/13/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/28/17  
Refer
3/28/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
6/20/17  
Refer
6/20/17  
Refer
6/20/17  
Report Pass
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Enrolled
9/5/17  
Chaptered
9/25/17  
Chaptered
9/25/17  

Caption

Collateral recovery: repossession agencies.

Impact

The passage of AB290 reinforces the regulatory framework surrounding repossession agencies, ensuring that such businesses adhere to licensing requirements and operational guidelines outlined by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. By solidifying the definition of who qualifies as a repossession agency, the bill aims to protect consumers while maintaining order in the market for repossession services related to agricultural collateral. This could help mitigate disputes that arise due to ambiguities in the previous regulations.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 290 focuses on the regulation of repossession agencies under the Collateral Recovery Act in California. The bill amends Section 7500.3 of the Business and Professions Code to extend the definition of a repossession agency indefinitely, specifically concerning dealers involved in the sale of collateral that is chiefly used for agricultural purposes. Previously, this definition had an expiration date of January 1, 2018, but through AB290, the legislature seeks to ensure consistent oversight of these entities moving forward.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB290 has generally been favorable among legislators and industry stakeholders. Supporters argue that the bill enhances consumer protection while providing necessary clarity in the repossession industry, particularly for those dealing with agricultural collateral. There was an acknowledgment among proponents that establishing a clear regulatory pathway would benefit both the repossession agencies and consumers alike by delineating the responsibilities and requirements.

Contention

While there does not appear to be significant contention surrounding AB290 in the available discussions, there are underlying concerns regarding the implications of regulation for smaller repossession agencies and businesses engaged in agricultural sales. Legislators have been attentive to these aspects, acknowledging the need to balance consumer protections with ensuring that regulations do not unduly burden small businesses operating in this sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2228

Collateral recovery: notice.

CA AB913

Collateral recovery.

CA AB2759

Collateral recovery.

IL SB0800

REGULATION-TECH

IL SB1500

COLLATERAL RECOVERY-VARIOUS

CA SB1454

Bureau of Security and Investigative Services: sunset.

IN SB0295

Licensing of collateral recovery services.