California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3084

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
5/2/18  

Caption

Public employees: other postemployment benefits: annual report.

Impact

The introduction of AB3084 could significantly reshape local and state regulatory frameworks, as it places greater emphasis on environmental safeguards. If passed, it would enhance the authority of the state to impose stricter regulations on businesses that contribute to environmental degradation. This is expected to lead to increased compliance costs for companies, potentially affecting their operations, but supporters contend that the long-term benefits of reduced pollution and improved public health will outweigh these costs. The bill also includes provisions that would enable local governments to implement additional measures tailored to their specific environmental challenges.

Summary

AB3084 seeks to amend existing state laws related to environmental regulations, aiming to tighten controls over pollution and increase accountability for businesses. One of the primary focuses of the bill is to address environmental issues more effectively, ensuring that local communities are safeguarded from harmful practices. Proponents of the bill argue that such regulations are necessary to protect public health and the environment, viewing it as a crucial step towards a more sustainable future. They believe that stricter controls will lead to better management of natural resources and improve the quality of life for residents.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB3084 appears to be mixed. Supporters, including environmental advocacy groups and some lawmakers, express strong support, emphasizing the necessity of the proposed regulations to address pressing environmental issues. Conversely, opponents, particularly representatives from business sectors, argue that the bill could lead to excessive regulatory burdens that might hinder economic growth and innovation. The debate touches upon broader themes of environmental responsibility versus economic freedom, showcasing divergent priorities among different interest groups.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns that AB3084 imposes overly restrictive measures that could disproportionately affect small businesses and disrupt local economies. Critics highlight that the bill could result in unintended consequences, such as job losses in industries heavily impacted by increased regulations. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the effectiveness of proposed measures, with some legislators questioning whether they will achieve the desired environmental outcomes. This ongoing dialogue reflects a larger conflict between the need for environmental stewardship and maintaining economic viability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00337

An Act Establishing A Municipal Postemployment Benefit Plan Deficit Funding Bonds Pilot Program.

CT HB05480

An Act Establishing A Municipal Postemployment Benefit Plan Deficit Funding Bonds Pilot Program.

TX HB3488

Relating to financial accounting and reporting of pension benefits for employees of this state and political subdivisions of this state.

CA AB165

Budget Act of 2022.

CA AB196

State employment: State Bargaining Units: agreements.

CA SB196

State employment: State Bargaining Units: agreements.

CA AB142

State employment: State Bargaining Units: memoranda of understanding: addenda.

CA SB142

State employment: State Bargaining Units.