California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3218

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Refer
4/26/18  
Refer
4/26/18  
Refer
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/28/18  
Enrolled
8/28/18  
Vetoed
9/18/18  

Caption

Millerton Lake State Recreation Area: acquisition of land.

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly impact California's state park management by expanding the recreational opportunities within the Millerton Lake area. By specifying that the Conservancy cannot use eminent domain for land acquisition, it ensures a voluntary and consensual approach to land management. This move is critical in maintaining the ecological integrity and recreational value of the area, providing citizens with enhanced access to natural resources and recreational activities without the imposition of government authority on landowners.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3218, introduced by Assembly Member Arambula, focuses on the expansion and management of the Millerton Lake State Recreation Area, particularly concerning approximately 5,900 acres of land adjacent to the San Joaquin River. The bill mandates the Department of Parks and Recreation to manage these lands effectively and allows the San Joaquin River Conservancy to acquire land if it becomes available for sale. Notably, this acquisition must be carried out without exercising the power of eminent domain, emphasizing a collaborative approach to public land management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 3218 appears to be generally positive among environmental advocates and recreational groups, as it promotes conservation and enhances public access to natural spaces. Stakeholders have expressed support for the bill, viewing it as a proactive step toward preserving the ecological and recreational values of the San Joaquin River area. This bill fosters community engagement through its focus on local management and land stewardship.

Contention

While the bill has strong support, some points of contention may arise regarding land acquisition strategies. The restriction on using eminent domain may limit the Conservancy's ability to secure desired lands quickly, possibly delaying the intended expansion of the recreation area. Opponents might argue that without the ability to compel land sales, enhancing the recreational area could become a lengthy process and may leave gaps in land protection efforts that could be critical for wildlife and habitat conservation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB559

Millerton Lake State Recreation Area: acquisition of land.

CA AB176

Water project: Friant-Kern Canal.

CA SB487

Department of Water Resources: aerial snow survey.

CA SB958

Surplus state property: County of Napa.

CA SB796

State parks: state beaches: County of Los Angeles: Manhattan State Beach: deed restrictions: taxation.

CA AB3353

State parks: state beaches: County of Los Angeles: deed restrictions.

CA AB3028

State parks: Will Rogers State Beach and Dockweiler State Beach: County of Los Angeles: grants in trust of state beaches.

CA AB2607

Tidelands and submerged lands: City and County of San Francisco: Port of San Francisco.