California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3254

Introduced
3/14/18  
Introduced
3/14/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
5/10/18  
Report Pass
5/10/18  
Engrossed
5/21/18  
Engrossed
5/21/18  
Refer
5/22/18  
Refer
5/22/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Enrolled
6/25/18  
Enrolled
6/25/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Passed
7/9/18  

Caption

Local government organization: omnibus.

Impact

With these amendments, AB 3254 aims to enhance clarity and functionality within local government administrative processes. The bill mandates that notifications regarding proposed changes must be sent to property owners and voters within designated areas, particularly those within 300 feet of the affected site. This requirement is specified to apply only during commission proceedings, thereby streamlining certain aspects of the proposal notification process and ensuring that relevant stakeholders are informed of impending municipal decisions.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 3254, also known as the Local Government Organization Omnibus Bill, amends several sections of the Government Code pertaining to local government organization and reorganization. The primary purpose of AB 3254 is to refine definitions related to territories governed by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, which outlines procedures for municipal reorganizations and sphere of influence adjustments. The bill introduces clarifications regarding 'affected territory' and 'inhabited territory', including new definitions to address areas receiving extended services from local entities.

Sentiment

The reception of AB 3254 among stakeholders seems to be generally supportive as it provides a structured approach to local governance operations. Proponents argue that the legislation is essential for maintaining an organized local government framework, while ensuring that local residents are well-informed about changes that could impact their community. Some concerns may come from those wary of potential administrative complexities or perceived inequities in decision-making processes; however, these appear to be overshadowed by the overall positive sentiment regarding improved clarity and communication.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as a necessary update to local governance laws, there are nuances that may spark debate, particularly regarding how extended services are defined and which proposals would require public hearings. The specific details of how changes could affect property tax revenues among municipalities within reorganization efforts could also be a point of contention, particularly if it leads to unequal distribution or service provision among different communities. Nonetheless, the bill's intent to clarify and streamline local governmental processes is a significant step towards enhancing civic engagement.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB600

Local government: organization: disadvantaged unincorporated communities.

CA AB1581

Local government: omnibus.

CA SB448

Local government: organization: districts.

CA SB938

The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000: protest proceedings: procedural consolidation.

CA AB2957

Local government: reorganization.

CA AB1822

Local Government: omnibus.