The introduction of AB 367 reflects the state's ongoing concern with water resource management, particularly in the wake of natural disasters such as fires. By allowing rebuilding efforts to proceed despite previous restrictions, the bill addresses the urgent housing needs of residents who have lost their homes, balancing public safety and housing demand. Moreover, this amendment is characterized by the legislature as declaratory of existing law, suggesting that the change aligns with current legislative interpretations regarding rebuilding in the aftermath of disasters.
Summary
Assembly Bill 367, introduced by Obernolte, aims to amend Section 106.4 of the California Water Code concerning water supply and building permits. The bill specifically targets the limitations placed on cities and counties regarding the issuance of building permits for new residential developments that rely on non-traditional water sources, such as water transported by haulers, bottled water, or retail water facilities. Its primary amendment allows for the issuance of building permits for rebuilding residences destroyed by fire, ensuring that these properties can be restored even if they rely on the aforementioned water sources.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 367 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among stakeholders concerned with addressing housing shortages and the needs of communities recovering from disasters. Supporters argue that it facilitates essential rebuilding efforts, aligning with broader state initiatives to enhance resilience against climate-related impacts. Conversely, there may be caution among critics regarding the implications of using non-traditional water sources for residential development, emphasizing the need for sustainable water management.
Contention
Some points of contention may arise from concerns related to the reliance on alternative water sources for residential development. Opponents may argue that the use of transported water, bottled water, or similar options could pose long-term risks for sustainability and public health. As the bill moves through legislative processes, these discussions will likely continue, revolving around the broader implications of water resource policy within the context of emergency recovery efforts.