California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB432

Introduced
2/13/17  
Introduced
2/13/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/13/17  
Refer
7/13/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Refer
9/11/17  
Refer
9/11/17  
Refer
9/11/17  
Enrolled
9/15/17  
Enrolled
9/15/17  
Vetoed
10/15/17  

Caption

Personal care services.

Impact

The legislation is significant for individuals receiving in-home supportive services and personal care, as it not only expands who can provide these services but also stipulates that certain information about employees who provide such services is exempt from public disclosure. This is intended to safeguard the privacy and well-being of those providing care, which addresses concerns raised by advocacy groups regarding the transparency of public records that could potentially expose vulnerable individuals to risks.

Summary

Assembly Bill 432, introduced by Assembly Member Thurmond, focuses on personal care services within the framework of California's Medi-Cal program. The bill amends various sections of the Government Code and the Welfare and Institutions Code to provide clear provisions for the governance of waiver personal care services. It allows county boards of supervisors to contract with nonprofit consortia or establish public authorities to deliver these services, aiming to enhance the support available for aged, blind, or disabled individuals who necessitate assistance to live independently in their homes.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding AB 432 appears to be supportive, particularly among those advocating for greater protections for care providers and recipients of in-home services. However, there may be some contention regarding the implications of the public records exemption, as privacy protections are balanced against public transparency, a point of concern for some watchdog organizations and civil liberties advocates who question the necessity of limiting public access.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention lies in the amendment's potential to limit access to information that the public traditionally has a right to see, particularly concerning the operations and conduct of public authorities involved in health care services. Critics argue that while protecting individual privacy is essential, such measures could impede accountability and oversight mechanisms that ensure quality and ethical service delivery in the public health sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3114

Personal care services.

CA AB1672

In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act.

CA AB283

In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act.

CA SB845

Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Fund.

CA AB1811

Human services omnibus.

CA AB675

In-home supportive services.

CA AB3079

In-Home Supportive Services program: undocumented related providers.

CA SB1260

State summary criminal history information.