Employer liability: small business and microbusiness.
The bill significantly influences California's water management policies by encouraging landowners to take voluntary actions that promote waterfowl, upland game birds, and other wildlife habitats. It requires the establishment of an incentive program by the Wildlife Conservation Board, which may involve grants or financial incentives for landowners who comply. This aligns with state-level environmental priorities while also accommodating agricultural practices. Furthermore, the bill alters the enforcement landscape for small businesses by prohibiting any enforcement action for nonserious violations unless a notice to correct is issued, promoting a more supportive environment for smaller employers.
Assembly Bill 472 addresses two primary areas: water management concerning idled agricultural land and the enforcement actions related to workplace safety violations for small businesses. The bill seeks to enhance wildlife habitat by allowing nonirrigated cover crops and natural vegetation to remain on idled agricultural lands without penalties from the Department of Water Resources, unless these crops threaten other legal users of water. This effectively incentivizes landowners to maintain wildlife-supporting vegetation which might otherwise be removed during farming operations.
The sentiment around AB 472 appears to be generally positive, particularly among environmental advocates and small business organizations. Proponents view the bill as a balanced approach that allows for ecological conservation while providing leniency to small business owners. However, concerns may arise regarding the implementation of the incentive program and ensuring compliance with environmental requirements, suggesting that while support exists, there may still be some apprehension about the logistics of enforcement and compliance.
Notable points of contention include the balance between agricultural water use and wildlife conservation, as some stakeholders might feel that allowing vegetation could interfere with water availability for agricultural use. Additionally, the effectiveness of the proposed incentive program will likely be scrutinized, as its success hinges on landowner participation and actual environmental impact. The measures intended to protect wildlife may raise concerns from agricultural sectors wary of restrictions on land use, particularly during times of water scarcity.