California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB500

Introduced
2/13/17  
Introduced
2/13/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Report Pass
5/2/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/11/17  
Engrossed
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Report Pass
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/14/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
10/8/17  
Chaptered
10/8/17  
Passed
10/8/17  

Caption

Employee codes of conduct: employee interactions with pupils.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts the existing framework for communications between educational institutions and parents or guardians. By requiring that a written copy of the section on employee interactions with pupils is provided at the start of each school year, the legislation fosters greater transparency and accountability concerning employee conduct in educational settings. Educational agencies are advised to integrate this information with other necessary notifications, addressing both statutory requirements and enhancing parental awareness of these conduct policies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 500 (AB500), authored by Bloom, introduces new requirements regarding employee codes of conduct for local educational agencies (LEAs) in California. The bill mandates that LEAs, including private schools that offer instruction at the elementary or high school level, must include and disseminate a specific section regarding employee interactions with pupils within their code of conduct. Starting from January 1, 2018, these agencies are required to publish this information on their respective websites or provide a link to it, while ensuring public accessibility without password restrictions.

Sentiment

Sentiments surrounding AB500 are generally supportive among advocates of educational reform who emphasize parental involvement and the importance of clear guidelines in professional conduct for educators. Many stakeholders view this initiative as a positive step towards improving student safety and fostering an environment of trust between parents and schools. However, there are concerns raised by some private educational institutions with limited resources about their capacity to comply with these mandated requirements.

Contention

While AB500 aims to clarify interactions between employees and pupils, its implementation may face challenges. Some private schools may struggle to meet the new obligations due to budget constraints or lack of online infrastructure. Moreover, there is potential contention over how strictly these guidelines will be enforced across various educational agencies, particularly between public and private institutions, which could lead to disparities in compliance and accountability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

GA SB351

"Protecting Georgia's Children on Social Media Act of 2024"; enact

SC H3431

South Carolina Social Media Regulation Act

CA AB173

School safety: peace officer interactions with pupils and nonpupils.

OK HB1388

Schools; creating the Protecting Oklahoma's Children on Social Media Act of 2025; directing adoption of acceptable-use and social media policies; effective date; emergency.

CA AB1510

Fighting Fentanyl Bond Act of 2024.

CA AB1355

Personal information.

CA AB947

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: sensitive personal information.

IA HF2546

A bill for an act relating to minors using the internet, including social media and internet safety instruction and education requirements in public schools and liability for publication of obscene material available to minors on the internet.(Formerly HF 2114.)