Desalination: statewide goal.
The bill's impact on state law is significant as it adds Section 12946.5 to the Water Code, leveraging existing frameworks such as the Cobey-Porter Saline Water Conversion Law. It encourages the exploration and deployment of desalination technologies, highlighting the imperative for safe and clean drinking water amidst competing resource demands. By setting clear goals for desalination, AB 554 not only aims to increase available water supplies but also potentially shifts funding and support towards desalination projects, mirroring other water supply reliability initiatives.
Assembly Bill 554, introduced by Assembly Member Cunningham, aims to address California's ongoing water resource challenges, particularly in light of its frequent drought conditions. The bill establishes a statewide goal to desalinate 300,000 acre-feet of drinking water per year by 2025 and 500,000 acre-feet per year by 2030. This legislative initiative is rooted in the recognition that the state's population and economic demands necessitate new and reliable sources of drinking water, thereby supporting public health and safety across California.
General sentiment regarding AB 554 reflects an urgency to prepare for future water shortages; however, it remains polarized. Proponents view desalination as a crucial innovation for addressing water scarcity and supporting resilience against droughts. In contrast, there are concerns regarding the environmental impacts of desalination processes, including energy consumption and ocean ecosystem effects. Thus, while the sentiment is largely in favor of increased water availability, there is apprehension about the environmental implications and sustainability of such projects.
Notable points of contention surrounding AB 554 include the environmental implications and cost efficiency of desalination. Critics may argue that while the bill advocates for increased water supply, it could inadvertently encourage over-reliance on desalinated water, detracting from conservation initiatives and sustainable water use practices. The debate also touches upon regional disparities in water access and management, with some stakeholders advocating for tailored solutions that address specific local needs rather than statewide mandates.