California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB569

Introduced
2/14/17  
Introduced
2/14/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Report Pass
7/17/17  
Report Pass
7/17/17  
Refer
7/18/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Vetoed
10/15/17  

Caption

Discrimination: reproductive health.

Impact

The legislation’s primary impact is the enhancement of the right to privacy regarding reproductive health in employment settings. By reinforcing that employees cannot face repercussions for their reproductive health decisions, it provides a clear legal framework that employers must follow. Additionally, it mandates that employee handbooks must include provisions detailing these rights, inherently changing the compliance landscape for California employers.

Summary

Assembly Bill 569, introduced by Assembly Member Gonzalez Fletcher, addresses discrimination based on reproductive health decisions within the workplace. It amends the California Labor Code to make it unlawful for employers to take adverse actions against employees regarding their reproductive health choices, including decisions about timing and methods of medical services. The bill aligns with the principles of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, emphasizing the protection of personal characteristics in employment.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 569 appears to be supportive among progressive legislators and advocacy groups, as it strengthens protections for employee rights. Proponents highlight the importance of safeguarding individuals’ rights to make personal health decisions without the interference of employers. However, potential concerns from some employer groups about the implications of the bill on workplace dynamics were observed, though these perspectives were less prominent in the discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise about the interpretation and application of 'adverse actions' and how this law might affect employees working at religiously affiliated institutions, given their unique exemptions under the law. The bill seeks to clarify that all employees, including those in religious entities, should have the same protections unless they fall under specific ministerial exceptions. This aspect raises discussions on balancing religious freedoms with comprehensive employee rights in California.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB523

Contraceptive Equity Act of 2022.

CA SB200

Drinking water.

CA AB100

State government.

CA AB508

Drinking water: consolidation and extension of service: domestic wells.

CA AB2085

Planning and zoning: permitted use: community clinic.

CA AB1737

Local government: zoning and planning.

CA AB1188

Transportation: bicycle safety handbook.

CA SB1254

Drinking water: administrator: managerial and other services.