California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB653

Introduced
2/14/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Report Pass
5/17/17  
Engrossed
6/1/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
8/23/17  
Refer
8/23/17  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/21/18  
Report Pass
6/21/18  
Refer
6/21/18  
Refer
6/25/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Refer
8/20/18  
Refer
8/20/18  
Enrolled
8/27/18  
Enrolled
8/27/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  
Passed
9/23/18  

Caption

Joint powers agreements: County of Santa Barbara: nonprofit hospitals.

Impact

The bill is designed to address unique challenges faced by healthcare providers and nonprofit hospitals in the County of Santa Barbara. By enabling these entities to collaborate through joint powers agreements, the intention is to enhance operational efficiencies while safeguarding essential emergency services. This legislative approach underscores a shift towards cooperative governance models aimed at improving healthcare delivery in the region.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 653, introduced by Cunningham, focuses on facilitating joint powers agreements between nonprofit hospitals and public agencies specifically in the County of Santa Barbara. The bill amends the Government Code to allow a private, nonprofit hospital to enter into such agreements while ensuring that any reduction or elimination of emergency services cannot occur without a public hearing. This stipulation is critical for maintaining transparency and community engagement when significant healthcare services could be affected.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 653 appears to be supportive, particularly among healthcare stakeholders who see the value in collaboration for service provision. The provision requiring public hearings fosters a sense of accountability and community involvement, which has likely contributed to the positive reception of the bill. However, some skepticism may exist regarding the effective implementation of these agreements and their long-term impact on service availability.

Contention

Notably, a potential point of contention could arise from how well the public hearings are executed and whether communities feel that their voices are adequately represented in decisions about emergency services. Critics could argue that while the bill seems beneficial, it does not fully address the concerns some may have about the motivations behind joint powers agreements and the real implications on local service provisions, particularly in the context of maintaining robust emergency care.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB545

Joint powers agreements: County of El Dorado: nonprofit hospitals.

CA AB587

Accessory dwelling units: sale or separate conveyance.

NJ A3601

Authorizes establishment of regional economic development partnerships.

NJ A2796

Authorizes establishment of regional economic development partnerships.

NJ S616

Authorizes establishment of regional economic development partnerships.

CA AB2534

Public resources: environmental education: grant program: Hollister Ranch.

NJ S2099

Authorizes establishment of regional economic development partnerships.

CA AB1602

Student, faculty, and staff housing: California Student Housing Revolving Loan Fund Act of 2022.