California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB661

Introduced
2/14/17  
Introduced
2/14/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Engrossed
4/20/17  
Engrossed
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
6/29/17  
Report Pass
6/29/17  
Refer
7/3/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Chaptered
9/27/17  
Chaptered
9/27/17  
Passed
9/27/17  

Caption

Magnesia Spring Ecological Reserve: Mirage Trail.

Impact

The bill mandates that a designated entity must take responsibility for essential components such as fencing to prevent hikers from straying into sensitive habitats of the Peninsular bighorn sheep, as well as implementing educational signage. Moreover, it commits the designated entity to invest a minimum of $100,000 for monitoring the bighorn sheep populations, in accordance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. The bill further emphasizes accountability by requiring the Fish and Game Commission to evaluate compliance and report findings every two years, thus fostering ongoing oversight.

Summary

Assembly Bill 661 aims to amend Section 1587 of the Fish and Game Code, specifically addressing the management of the Mirage Trail within the Magnesia Spring Ecological Reserve. The bill ensures that the trail remains accessible for recreational hiking for nine months of the year, from May to January, while being closed for three months (February to April). This path's accessibility is contingent upon the Fish and Game Commission's determination that local agencies or nonstate entities meet specific financial and operational requirements related to the trail management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 661 has generally been positive, reflecting a consensus on the need to balance recreational access with wildlife protection. Supporters view the bill as a critical step towards sustainable wildlife conservation efforts, particularly for the increasingly vulnerable Peninsular bighorn sheep. However, some stakeholders have expressed concerns about the adequacy of the proposed monitoring and financial commitments, questioning whether they would sufficiently safeguard the sensitive ecological habitat.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention associated with AB 661 include the long-term feasibility of the financial commitments laid out in the bill, particularly given that the designated funding must meet specific timelines and regulatory requirements. Critics have voiced apprehensions regarding the potential for insufficient resources to meet the preservation goals outlined in the bill, particularly in the context of increasing visitor traffic to the reserve. The bill also includes a sunset provision, scheduled for repeal on January 1, 2028, without further legislative action, which adds an additional layer of urgency to discussions about the trail's management and oversight.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT HB0313

Construction Industry Amendments

HI HB1113

Relating To Changes To Responsibilities Of The Department Of Health Concerning Patients, The County Of Kalawao, And The Kalaupapa Settlement.

HI SB1432

Relating To Changes To Responsibilities Of The Department Of Health Concerning Patients, The County Of Kalawao, And The Kalaupapa Settlement.

ME LD1914

An Act to Address Housing Density Requirements in Sole Source Aquifer Island and Peninsular Communities

UT HB0064

State Construction and Fire Codes Amendments

UT HB0532

Building Code Revisions

UT HB0518

State Construction Code Modifications

CA AB1270

Dams and reservoirs: inspections and reporting.