California Assembly Bill AB666

California 2017-2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/14/17
• Refer: 3/2/17
• Report Pass: 1/10/18
• Engrossed: 1/16/18
• Refer: 1/16/18
• Refer: 2/14/18
• Report Pass: 5/24/18
• Refer: 5/24/18
• Report Pass: 6/6/18
• Enrolled: 8/6/18
• Chaptered: 8/20/18
• Passed: 8/20/18

Caption

Elections: voter information guides: candidate statements.

Impact

The implementation of AB 666 could significantly impact state election laws by enhancing the efficiency of candidate statement submissions for elections. By allowing electronic submissions and setting clear protocols, the bill seeks to minimize bureaucratic obstacles that candidates may face when trying to communicate their platforms to voters. Additionally, requiring county elections officials to accept forms from candidates' home counties promotes consistency and accessibility in the elections process across California's diverse local jurisdictions.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 666, introduced by Aguiar-Curry, focuses on modifying regulations related to candidate statements in voter information guides. The bill mandates that elections officials must accept electronic submissions of candidate statements if they are submitted according to specified timeframes and procedures. This change aims to streamline the process for candidates seeking to provide statements in county voter information guides, making it easier for both candidates and elections officials to manage submissions. The bill is particularly relevant for candidates running in multicounty districts, as it facilitates submission from the candidate's county of residence.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 666 is primarily positive, especially among those advocating for modernizing the electoral process. Supporters believe that the move towards electronic submissions represents a necessary adaptation to current technological advances, making it easier for candidates to participate in elections. However, there may be slight concerns from those who prefer traditional methods, arguing that digital processes could potentially alienate candidates unfamiliar with technology.

Contention

While the bill does seem to enjoy broad support, potential points of contention may arise regarding the details of implementation. Critics could argue about the sufficiency of protections against errors in electronic submissions, which could affect candidates' representation. Furthermore, there could be discussions about whether this approach adequately addresses the needs of all candidates, particularly those from less technologically inclined backgrounds or areas with limited internet access.