California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB68

Introduced
12/14/16  
Introduced
12/14/16  
Refer
1/19/17  
Refer
1/19/17  
Report Pass
1/23/17  
Report Pass
1/23/17  
Refer
1/24/17  
Refer
1/24/17  
Report Pass
2/21/17  
Report Pass
2/21/17  
Refer
2/22/17  
Refer
2/22/17  

Caption

School facilities: schoolsite acquisition.

Impact

The bill modifies existing school property acquisition protocols. Specifically, it alters the responsibilities of school district governing boards when considering property for new schools in areas designated for agriculture. School districts are now mandated to consider findings related to public health and safety issues posed by nearby agricultural operations. Notably, districts must obtain approval from the planning commission if the acquisition concerns properties set for agricultural use, thereby limiting their ability to override local zoning laws without due process.

Summary

Assembly Bill 68 (AB68), introduced by Assembly Member Mathis, aims to regulate the acquisition of new schoolsites in relation to proximity to agricultural lands. It requires that any new school facility built on or after January 1, 2018, within two miles of an operating farm must obtain its water supply from a public water system. This stipulation seeks to ensure the safety and health of students and staff by reducing potential risks associated with agricultural practices adjacent to school properties. The bill particularly focuses on rural school districts, imposing additional accountability measures to ensure compliance with agricultural zoning restrictions.

Sentiment

The reception of AB68 was mixed among legislative members and community stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure to protect students from potential health hazards posed by nearby farms and to respect the existing land-use plans. Conversely, opponents raise concerns regarding the potential for over-regulation, which could slow down the construction of necessary educational facilities. They argue that the bill could pose challenges for rural districts in finding suitable sites for new schools, ultimately impacting educational access for children in these areas.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding the bill, chiefly regarding the restrictions placed on rural school districts. Critics contend that imposing stringent requirements on school acquisition not only complicates the process but could delay critical infrastructure developments needed in growing communities. Additionally, there is concern about the broader implications of enforcing these regulations on zoning and land use, which may diminish local control over land development decisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2214

California Environmental Quality Act: schoolsites: acquisition of property: school districts, charter schools, and private schools.

CA AB762

Hazardous emissions and substances: schoolsites: private and charter schools.

CA AB2882

Hazardous emissions and substances: schoolsites: private and charter schools.

CA SB765

Planning and zoning: housing.

CA AB1501

Schoolsites.

CA AB1081

Education finance: local control funding formula: base grant add-on: pupil mental health.

CA AB938

Education finance: classified and certificated staff salaries.

CA AB1973

Kindergarten: minimum schoolday.