California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB710

Introduced
2/15/17  
Introduced
2/15/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Report Pass
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/27/17  
Refer
3/28/17  
Refer
3/28/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Refer
5/1/17  
Refer
5/1/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Report Pass
1/18/18  
Report Pass
1/18/18  
Refer
1/18/18  
Refer
1/18/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/9/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Report Pass
5/15/18  
Report Pass
5/15/18  
Refer
5/15/18  
Refer
5/15/18  
Enrolled
6/18/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Passed
7/9/18  

Caption

Cannabidiol.

Impact

AB 710 has the potential to significantly change the landscape of medical treatment options available for patients suffering from various medical conditions, including epilepsy. By facilitating the prescription and dispensing of FDA-approved CBD products that do not fall under Schedule I of the federal Controlled Substances Act, the bill supports a more flexible approach to the use of medical cannabis derivatives. This shift could allow for greater access to medically beneficial compounds as federal regulations continue to evolve.

Summary

Assembly Bill 710, also known as the Cannabidiol (CBD) Regulation Bill, aims to address the evolving status of cannabidiol in relation to controlled substances under California law. The bill proposes that if specific changes occur in federal law regarding the classification of CBD, healthcare providers prescribing CBD products would be considered compliant with state laws. This provision is particularly relevant given the increasing recognition of CBD as a potential therapeutic option for conditions such as epilepsy.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 710 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among advocates for medical cannabis and patients who could benefit from CBD. The urgency of the bill reflects the desire to expedite access to treatment options amid changing federal regulations. However, there remains a cautious perspective regarding the implications of federal law on state regulation and public safety, necessitating careful monitoring as the framework is established.

Contention

While the bill is aimed at expanding treatment options, it does exclude products derived from industrial hemp, which may lead to concerns about the consistency and availability of CBD products in the market. Additionally, discussions around the regulatory landscape continue, particularly in relation to the interplay between state and federal laws concerning cannabis derivatives. Opponents may raise questions about the adequacy of protections when considering patient access and product regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB845

Cannabidiol.

CA AB527

Controlled substances.

CA AB1021

Controlled substances: rescheduling.

IA HF442

A bill for an act relating to marijuana, including the manufacture, delivery, and possession of marijuana, the licensure of retail marijuana, and medical cannabis, providing fees, including excise taxes, establishing funds, providing penalties, and including effective date provisions.

CA SB519

Controlled substances: study of decriminalization of certain hallucinogenic substances.

OK SB249

Controlled dangerous substances; defining term; broadening hospice exception from electronic prescription requirement. Emergency.

OK SB249

Controlled dangerous substances; defining term; broadening hospice exception from electronic prescription requirement. Emergency.

IA SF2225

A bill for an act relating to operating a motor vehicle after consuming medical cannabidiol, and including effective date provisions.