California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB749

Introduced
2/15/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
1/3/18  
Report Pass
1/3/18  
Refer
1/4/18  
Report Pass
1/11/18  
Report Pass
1/11/18  
Refer
1/11/18  
Refer
1/11/18  
Refer
1/18/18  
Refer
1/18/18  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Real estate.

Impact

The bill has a significant impact on the operations and regulatory framework of real estate practices in California. For instance, it amends existing definitions within the Business and Professions Code to reinforce the responsibilities of brokers regarding licensing and compliance. This means that brokers must be more vigilant about their obligations to report changes and manage the licensing statuses of their agents. Additionally, the bill repeals existing provisions that previously excluded specific individuals from being classified as brokers, thus broadening the scope of who must comply with regulatory requirements.

Summary

Assembly Bill 749, introduced by Assembly Member Irwin, focuses on the regulation and licensing of real estate brokers and salespersons in California. The bill aims to streamline the processes by which brokers must report changes in their affiliations with licensees, requiring immediate notification of the state commissioner if a salesperson or broker affiliates with or is terminated from a broker. The redefinition of roles between sponsors and licensees emphasizes an oversight relationship, where brokers hold responsibility for the conduct of their salespersons under their supervision.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 749 appears to be pragmatic, aiming to enhance the professionalism and accountability within the real estate sector. Supporters view it as a necessary adjustment to current laws that will increase transparency and accountability among real estate professionals. Conversely, some may perceive the additional requirements as burdensome, particularly for those brokers managing numerous agents, who may face challenges in complying with the rigorous reporting requirements.

Contention

A notable point of contention within discussions around AB 749 revolves around the new reporting requirements imposed on brokers. Critics argue that this could lead to administrative overreach and complications for smaller brokers, who might struggle with the increased bureaucratic demands. Furthermore, the requirement for immediate reporting of affiliation changes could lead to heightened anxiety among licensees about their job security, contributing to a climate of distrust within broker-agent relationships.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2992

Real Estate Law: buyer-broker representation agreements.

CA AB1242

Real estate: contracts granting exclusivity to sell: one-year maximum.

CA SB164

State government.

CA AB164

State government.

CA AB1345

Residential Exclusive Listing Agreements Act.

CA AB3279

State Bar of California.

CA AB2993

Home improvement and home solicitation: right to cancel contracts: loan financing regulation.

CA AB2868

Real estate: real estate brokers.

CA SB869

Commercial financing.

CA SB611

Residential rental properties: fees and security.

Similar Bills

CA AB2884

Real estate.

AZ SB1171

Real estate department; licensing; administration

AZ SB1489

Subdivisions; definition; lots

CA AB687

Real estate brokers: limited liability companies.

CA SB800

Real estate: licenses.

CA SB251

Financial institutions.

CA AB1384

Local educational agencies: liability for COVID-19-related injuries.