Vessels: operation and equipment: blue lights.
The amendment broadens the existing law, which initially reserved blue lights exclusively for law enforcement vessels. By including fire department and fire protection district vessels, the bill effectively expands the range of vessels that can use these lights, thus creating a local program mandated by the state. This change is significant as it distinguishes various public safety vessels more clearly to the public, aiming to facilitate a safer interaction between these vessels and others on the water. Additionally, it mandates that vessels must slow down when encountering a public safety vessel displaying a blue light, which serves to protect both the personnel aboard these vessels and the public.
Assembly Bill No. 78 amends Section 652.5 of the Harbors and Navigation Code concerning the use of distinctive blue lights on vessels. The bill specifically reserves the use of these blue lights for public safety vessels, which includes law enforcement vessels, fire department vessels, and fire protection district vessels engaged in direct law enforcement activities or other public safety activities. The objective is to enhance recognition and identification of public safety vessels, thereby ensuring safety on waterways. The blue light may be displayed at any time when engaged in appropriate activities, and its use for other purposes is strictly prohibited.
The sentiment around AB 78 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among stakeholders in public safety sectors who view this measure as a necessary enhancement of operational safety for emergency responders. The inclusion of fire department vessels reflects an acknowledgment of their roles in maritime safety. However, there might be concerns among certain operators of other vessels regarding the strict enforcement of speed regulations when approaching public safety vessels. Proponents see this bill as a progressive step for improving public perception and operational clarity for safety entities at sea.
While the bill is mostly seen as beneficial, contention may arise regarding the implications of the expanded definition of public safety vessels. Some may question whether this leads to an overreach in authority, preventing non-public safety vessels from using similar identification signals. Furthermore, the bill states that no state reimbursement for local agencies is required due to the creation of a new infraction, which might raise concerns about unfunded mandates for local governments. There could be implications on how local jurisdictions adapt their operations to comply with the new regulations.