Pupil instruction: model curriculum: 2016 presidential election.
The passage of AB838 would significantly affect educational standards and practices within California's high schools. This inclusion is anticipated to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the electoral process and foreign influences in democratic systems. Furthermore, it may prompt other states to consider similar educational reforms aimed at enhancing political literacy among high school students.
AB838, also known as the Pravda Act of 2017, aims to revise the K-12 history-social science curriculum to include specific instruction on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The bill mandates that during the next revision of the curriculum frameworks, the Instructional Quality Commission will consider incorporating this topic and developing a model curriculum for secondary school government courses. The intent is to foster an understanding of contemporary issues in American political life by engaging students in relevant historical events.
The sentiment surrounding AB838 is largely supportive among legislators who believe that educating students on foreign interference is essential for promoting informed citizenship. However, there are also concerns regarding the politicization of educational content. Detractors worry that this requirement could lead to contentious debates over curriculum content, particularly regarding interpretations of political events and their historical significance.
A notable point of contention is centered around the notion of what constitutes appropriate educational material and how to present potentially divisive topics in a balanced manner. Critics argue that the emphasis on a singular political narrative could overshadow broader discussions about electoral integrity and democracy in an educational setting. Additionally, questions arise about the capacity of educators to responsibly teach these controversial topics without bias.