California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB839

Introduced
2/16/17  
Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Report Pass
3/23/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
6/22/17  
Report Pass
6/22/17  
Refer
6/22/17  
Refer
6/22/17  
Report Pass
7/18/17  
Report Pass
7/18/17  
Refer
7/18/17  
Refer
7/18/17  
Refer
8/21/17  

Caption

Medi-Cal: targeted case management.

Impact

Should AB 839 pass, it will allow tribes to contract directly with the California Department of Health Care Services to deliver targeted case management services. This is expected to facilitate a more inclusive approach to healthcare access, whereby tribal organizations can tailor services to better meet the unique needs of their communities. Moreover, this amendment could lead to a more efficient use of resources, as funds can be localized to address specific community issues rather than relying solely on broader county or city frameworks.

Summary

Assembly Bill 839 seeks to amend the existing Medi-Cal framework by broadening the definition of local governmental agencies to include California Native American tribes and organizations. This change specifically pertains to the Targeted Case Management (TCM) Program, which aims to enhance access to medical, social, and educational services for eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries. The bill's introduction reflects a growing recognition of the role that tribal organizations can play in improving healthcare delivery to diverse populations, especially those historically underserved.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 839 appears to be largely positive among advocates of indigenous rights and healthcare equity. Supporters view the bill as a crucial step toward recognizing the sovereignty of Native tribes and enhancing their capacity to serve their members more effectively. In contrast, some skepticism exists regarding the additional administrative burden this might place on the Department, which must ensure compliance with both state and federal regulations while managing a more complex network of service providers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include potential concerns around the financial implications for the state, especially in terms of administrative costs and the possibility of overlapping governance issues. Critics might argue that while empowering tribal organizations is essential, there should be stringent regulations governing contracts to safeguard against misuse of funds. Additionally, the effectiveness of these changes in actually improving service delivery remains to be seen and may require careful monitoring and evaluation to ensure that the anticipated benefits materialize.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB481

California Mental Health Planning Council: name change.

CA AB2034

Local educational agency: Medi-Cal billing option.

CA AB942

California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal initiative.

CA AB2055

Specialty mental health services and substance use disorder treatment.

CA AB875

Medi-Cal: demonstration project.

CA AB1132

Medi-Cal.

CA AB1590

Personal income tax: credit: qualified first-time homebuyer.

CA AB1705

Medi-Cal: emergency medical transportation services.