California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB889 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Amended IN Assembly January 29, 2018 Amended IN Assembly January 08, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 30, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 20, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 06, 2017 Amended IN Assembly March 30, 2017 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 889Introduced by Assembly Member Mark StoneFebruary 16, 2017 An act to amend Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to secrecy agreements. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 889, as amended, Mark Stone. Secrecy agreements.Existing law specifies that certain types of confidential or privileged information shall not be introduced as evidence in a court action. Existing law generally permits the parties to a civil action to include, as a condition to a settlement, a provision requiring that information about the settlement or the underlying dispute be kept confidential; however, existing law prohibits a confidential settlement agreement in a civil action with a factual foundation establishing a cause of action for civil damages for an act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense. Existing law also establishes that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney, and it requires the State Bar of California to investigate and take appropriate action in any case brought to its attention.This bill would instead authorize but not require the State Bar to investigate these cases of attorney misconduct. This bill would also provide that in an action based upon the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, as defined, information relating to the danger that was discovered during the course of litigation shall not be kept secret pursuant to an agreement of the parties or a court order, except that a court or arbitral tribunal may order information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret be kept secret in narrow circumstances. The bill would similarly establish that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to better protect Californians from death or substantial injury caused by any danger to the public health or safety, including defective products and environmental hazards, by creating a presumption against secrecy that protects the openness of information acquired through discovery. This presumption is to apply to settlement and confidentiality agreements, whether or not filed with the court, and to all stipulations for protective orders that would limit the disclosure of information acquired through discovery.SEC. 2. Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Section 24 of Chapter 561 of the Statutes of 2017, is amended to read:1002. (a) As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Protective order means an order issued by a judge that prevents the disclosure or dissemination of confidential information within documents that are obtained during discovery or in the course of litigation, including an order requiring a party to return documents to an opposing party at the end of the litigation.(2)(3) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage. has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact action for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(d) Notwithstanding any other law, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in this sectionsubdivision (b) or (c) shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an a protective order that restricts the disclosure of information described in this section, those subdivisions, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e). This subdivision does not prevent a court from issuing a protective order if the documents or information sought to be covered by the order include trade secrets or proprietary information.(e) (1) Subdivisions (b) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of an offense listed in subdivision (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i)Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii). a protective order. The order shall be narrowly tailored and narrowly construed. A court is not obligated to review any documents that are subject to a requested protective order if the moving party attests, under penalty of perjury, that the documents do not contain evidence showing that the party responsible for the product or condition knows or should know that the product or condition is an ongoing danger to the public health or safety. If the party moving for a protective order does not attest to this fact, the court may refuse to issue the order or may hold a hearing requiring the moving party to show good cause as to why the protective order should be issued without the attestation.(ii)A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
1+Amended IN Assembly January 08, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 30, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 20, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 06, 2017 Amended IN Assembly March 30, 2017 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 889Introduced by Assembly Member Mark StoneFebruary 16, 2017 An act to amend Section 1002 of, and to add Section 1002.5 to, of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to secrecy agreements. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 889, as amended, Mark Stone. Secrecy agreements.Existing law specifies that certain types of confidential or privileged information shall not be introduced as evidence in a court action. Existing law generally permits the parties to a civil action to include, as a condition to a settlement, a provision requiring that information about the settlement or the underlying dispute be kept confidential; however, existing law prohibits a confidential settlement agreement in a civil action with a factual foundation establishing a cause of action for civil damages for an act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense. Existing law also establishes that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney, and it requires the State Bar of California to investigate and take appropriate action in any case brought to its attention.This bill would instead authorize but not require the State Bar to investigate these cases of attorney misconduct. This bill would also provide that in an action based upon the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, as defined, information relating to the danger that was discovered during the course of litigation shall not be kept secret pursuant to an agreement of the parties or a court order, except pursuant to a court order based upon specified findings. This bill would permit persons to contest in court a confidentiality provision in a final order, judgment, or written settlement agreement that violates this prohibition. that a court or arbitral tribunal may order information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret be kept secret in narrow circumstances. The bill would similarly establish that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to better protect Californians from death or substantial injury caused by any danger to the public health or safety, including defective products and environmental hazards, by creating a presumption against secrecy that protects the openness of information acquired through discovery. This presumption is to apply to settlement and confidentiality agreements, whether or not filed with the court, and to all stipulations for protective orders that would limit the disclosure of information acquired through discovery.SEC. 2. Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Section 24 of Chapter 561 of the Statutes of 2017, is amended to read:1002. (a) Notwithstanding As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(b)(d) Notwithstanding any other law, in there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), this section shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a). described in this section, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).(c)(e) (1) Subdivisions (a) (b) and (b) (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the an offense listed in subdivision (a) (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i) Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii).(ii) A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(e)(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.SEC. 2.Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:1002.(a)Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1)An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2)An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3)An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4)An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(b)Notwithstanding any other law, in a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), a court shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a).(c)Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the offense listed in subdivision (a) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(e)An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California may investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.SEC. 3.Section 1002.5 is added to the Code of Civil Procedure, to read:1002.5.(a)As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1)Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental hazard that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death.(2)Defective product means a product that may be defective because of a defect in manufacturing, or design, or a failure to adequately warn the consumer of a hazard involved in the foreseeable use of the product, where the defect may result in bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(3)Environmental hazard means a release of a hazardous substance that poses a threat to public health or safety involving danger of death, bodily injury, or health disability to human beings exposed to hazardous substance release.(4)Independent finding means a finding by the court based solely on the courts review of the law as applied to the facts of the case, and not based in whole or in part on a stipulation of the parties to keep information secret or arguments in support of a stipulation to keep information secret.(5)Personally identifiable information includes the following:(A)The identity of, or personal information about, victims of harm, including children and victims of abuse.(B)Personal contact information of corporate officers or board members, or information relating to any individuals finances, medical history, health, or similar information.(b)Notwithstanding any other law, in any civil action in which the pleadings state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, an agreement between the parties that restricts the disclosure of information relating to that danger shall be void as contrary to public policy and shall not be enforced by a court or tribunal unless the agreement is entered by the court pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c). This subdivision does not prohibit parties from keeping confidential the settlement amount.(c)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), in any civil action in which the pleadings state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety caused by a defective product or environmental hazard, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to that danger shall not be restricted, and a court shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that does any of the following:(A)Restricts the disclosure of information about the danger.(B)Approves a settlement agreement that would restrict the disclosure of information about the danger.(C)Restricts access to court records containing information about the danger.(2)A court may enter an order otherwise prohibited by this subdivision if it finds that either of the following conditions is satisfied:(A)The pleadings do not state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety.(B)The presumption in favor of disclosure of the information is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest in maintaining the confidentiality of the information or records and the order does not restrict any more information than is necessary to protect that interest. A court shall not base this finding on the existence of a stipulation to keep the information secret.(3)A party who is the proponent for the entry of an order under paragraph (2) has the burden of proof in obtaining the order. The proponent, in his or her request for the order, shall set forth with particularity the specific information for which protection is sought, the specific and overriding interest necessitating confidentiality, such as that the information relates to a current proprietary customer list, or that the information is a trade secret that would give the proponents competitors valuable proprietary information if revealed.(d)This section does not apply to or affect any of the following:(1)The confidentiality of preagreement negotiations, settlement discussions between mediation participants pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1115) of Division 9 of the Evidence Code, or of evidence protected by Section 1153.5 or 1154 of the Evidence Code.(2)Actions relating to a business dispute, including actions for breach of contract, in which all the parties are business entities.(3)A trade secret, as defined in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code. A trade secret does not include information or records about a product that is defective, hazardous, or unlikely to be used by a competitor to the proponents competitive disadvantage.(4)Personally identifiable information.(e)An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that violates subdivision (b) may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California may investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention. This section does not prevent an attorney for a party from requesting an order under paragraph (2) of subdivision (c).(f)This section does not eliminate or supplant existing legal standards governing protective orders, the sealing of court records, or confidential settlements, but, rather, imposes additional requirements that must be independently satisfied.(g)A person, including a representative of the news media, may bring an action to contest a confidentiality provision in a final order, judgment, or written settlement agreement that violates this section in the court in which the case was filed, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:(1)The person makes a prima facie case that the order or settlement restricts information concerning a danger to public health or safety.(2)Public knowledge of the information will decrease the likelihood of harm caused by the danger to public health or safety.(3)The action contesting the confidentiality provision will not delay or prejudice the rights of the parties to the underlying action.
22
3- Amended IN Assembly January 29, 2018 Amended IN Assembly January 08, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 30, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 20, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 06, 2017 Amended IN Assembly March 30, 2017 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 889Introduced by Assembly Member Mark StoneFebruary 16, 2017 An act to amend Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to secrecy agreements. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 889, as amended, Mark Stone. Secrecy agreements.Existing law specifies that certain types of confidential or privileged information shall not be introduced as evidence in a court action. Existing law generally permits the parties to a civil action to include, as a condition to a settlement, a provision requiring that information about the settlement or the underlying dispute be kept confidential; however, existing law prohibits a confidential settlement agreement in a civil action with a factual foundation establishing a cause of action for civil damages for an act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense. Existing law also establishes that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney, and it requires the State Bar of California to investigate and take appropriate action in any case brought to its attention.This bill would instead authorize but not require the State Bar to investigate these cases of attorney misconduct. This bill would also provide that in an action based upon the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, as defined, information relating to the danger that was discovered during the course of litigation shall not be kept secret pursuant to an agreement of the parties or a court order, except that a court or arbitral tribunal may order information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret be kept secret in narrow circumstances. The bill would similarly establish that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
3+ Amended IN Assembly January 08, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 30, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 20, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 06, 2017 Amended IN Assembly March 30, 2017 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 889Introduced by Assembly Member Mark StoneFebruary 16, 2017 An act to amend Section 1002 of, and to add Section 1002.5 to, of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to secrecy agreements. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 889, as amended, Mark Stone. Secrecy agreements.Existing law specifies that certain types of confidential or privileged information shall not be introduced as evidence in a court action. Existing law generally permits the parties to a civil action to include, as a condition to a settlement, a provision requiring that information about the settlement or the underlying dispute be kept confidential; however, existing law prohibits a confidential settlement agreement in a civil action with a factual foundation establishing a cause of action for civil damages for an act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense. Existing law also establishes that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney, and it requires the State Bar of California to investigate and take appropriate action in any case brought to its attention.This bill would instead authorize but not require the State Bar to investigate these cases of attorney misconduct. This bill would also provide that in an action based upon the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, as defined, information relating to the danger that was discovered during the course of litigation shall not be kept secret pursuant to an agreement of the parties or a court order, except pursuant to a court order based upon specified findings. This bill would permit persons to contest in court a confidentiality provision in a final order, judgment, or written settlement agreement that violates this prohibition. that a court or arbitral tribunal may order information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret be kept secret in narrow circumstances. The bill would similarly establish that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
44
5- Amended IN Assembly January 29, 2018 Amended IN Assembly January 08, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 30, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 20, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 06, 2017 Amended IN Assembly March 30, 2017
5+ Amended IN Assembly January 08, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 30, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 20, 2017 Amended IN Assembly April 06, 2017 Amended IN Assembly March 30, 2017
66
7-Amended IN Assembly January 29, 2018
87 Amended IN Assembly January 08, 2018
98 Amended IN Assembly May 30, 2017
109 Amended IN Assembly April 20, 2017
1110 Amended IN Assembly April 06, 2017
1211 Amended IN Assembly March 30, 2017
1312
1413 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION
1514
1615 Assembly Bill No. 889
1716
1817 Introduced by Assembly Member Mark StoneFebruary 16, 2017
1918
2019 Introduced by Assembly Member Mark Stone
2120 February 16, 2017
2221
23- An act to amend Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to secrecy agreements.
22+ An act to amend Section 1002 of, and to add Section 1002.5 to, of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to secrecy agreements.
2423
2524 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2625
2726 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2827
2928 AB 889, as amended, Mark Stone. Secrecy agreements.
3029
31-Existing law specifies that certain types of confidential or privileged information shall not be introduced as evidence in a court action. Existing law generally permits the parties to a civil action to include, as a condition to a settlement, a provision requiring that information about the settlement or the underlying dispute be kept confidential; however, existing law prohibits a confidential settlement agreement in a civil action with a factual foundation establishing a cause of action for civil damages for an act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense. Existing law also establishes that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney, and it requires the State Bar of California to investigate and take appropriate action in any case brought to its attention.This bill would instead authorize but not require the State Bar to investigate these cases of attorney misconduct. This bill would also provide that in an action based upon the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, as defined, information relating to the danger that was discovered during the course of litigation shall not be kept secret pursuant to an agreement of the parties or a court order, except that a court or arbitral tribunal may order information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret be kept secret in narrow circumstances. The bill would similarly establish that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney.
30+Existing law specifies that certain types of confidential or privileged information shall not be introduced as evidence in a court action. Existing law generally permits the parties to a civil action to include, as a condition to a settlement, a provision requiring that information about the settlement or the underlying dispute be kept confidential; however, existing law prohibits a confidential settlement agreement in a civil action with a factual foundation establishing a cause of action for civil damages for an act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense. Existing law also establishes that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney, and it requires the State Bar of California to investigate and take appropriate action in any case brought to its attention.This bill would instead authorize but not require the State Bar to investigate these cases of attorney misconduct. This bill would also provide that in an action based upon the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, as defined, information relating to the danger that was discovered during the course of litigation shall not be kept secret pursuant to an agreement of the parties or a court order, except pursuant to a court order based upon specified findings. This bill would permit persons to contest in court a confidentiality provision in a final order, judgment, or written settlement agreement that violates this prohibition. that a court or arbitral tribunal may order information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret be kept secret in narrow circumstances. The bill would similarly establish that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney.
3231
3332 Existing law specifies that certain types of confidential or privileged information shall not be introduced as evidence in a court action. Existing law generally permits the parties to a civil action to include, as a condition to a settlement, a provision requiring that information about the settlement or the underlying dispute be kept confidential; however, existing law prohibits a confidential settlement agreement in a civil action with a factual foundation establishing a cause of action for civil damages for an act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense. Existing law also establishes that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney, and it requires the State Bar of California to investigate and take appropriate action in any case brought to its attention.
3433
35-This bill would instead authorize but not require the State Bar to investigate these cases of attorney misconduct. This bill would also provide that in an action based upon the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, as defined, information relating to the danger that was discovered during the course of litigation shall not be kept secret pursuant to an agreement of the parties or a court order, except that a court or arbitral tribunal may order information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret be kept secret in narrow circumstances. The bill would similarly establish that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney.
34+This bill would instead authorize but not require the State Bar to investigate these cases of attorney misconduct. This bill would also provide that in an action based upon the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, as defined, information relating to the danger that was discovered during the course of litigation shall not be kept secret pursuant to an agreement of the parties or a court order, except pursuant to a court order based upon specified findings. This bill would permit persons to contest in court a confidentiality provision in a final order, judgment, or written settlement agreement that violates this prohibition. that a court or arbitral tribunal may order information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret be kept secret in narrow circumstances. The bill would similarly establish that flouting this prohibition is grounds for professional discipline for an attorney.
3635
3736 ## Digest Key
3837
3938 ## Bill Text
4039
41-The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to better protect Californians from death or substantial injury caused by any danger to the public health or safety, including defective products and environmental hazards, by creating a presumption against secrecy that protects the openness of information acquired through discovery. This presumption is to apply to settlement and confidentiality agreements, whether or not filed with the court, and to all stipulations for protective orders that would limit the disclosure of information acquired through discovery.SEC. 2. Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Section 24 of Chapter 561 of the Statutes of 2017, is amended to read:1002. (a) As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Protective order means an order issued by a judge that prevents the disclosure or dissemination of confidential information within documents that are obtained during discovery or in the course of litigation, including an order requiring a party to return documents to an opposing party at the end of the litigation.(2)(3) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage. has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact action for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(d) Notwithstanding any other law, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in this sectionsubdivision (b) or (c) shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an a protective order that restricts the disclosure of information described in this section, those subdivisions, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e). This subdivision does not prevent a court from issuing a protective order if the documents or information sought to be covered by the order include trade secrets or proprietary information.(e) (1) Subdivisions (b) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of an offense listed in subdivision (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i)Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii). a protective order. The order shall be narrowly tailored and narrowly construed. A court is not obligated to review any documents that are subject to a requested protective order if the moving party attests, under penalty of perjury, that the documents do not contain evidence showing that the party responsible for the product or condition knows or should know that the product or condition is an ongoing danger to the public health or safety. If the party moving for a protective order does not attest to this fact, the court may refuse to issue the order or may hold a hearing requiring the moving party to show good cause as to why the protective order should be issued without the attestation.(ii)A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
40+The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to better protect Californians from death or substantial injury caused by any danger to the public health or safety, including defective products and environmental hazards, by creating a presumption against secrecy that protects the openness of information acquired through discovery. This presumption is to apply to settlement and confidentiality agreements, whether or not filed with the court, and to all stipulations for protective orders that would limit the disclosure of information acquired through discovery.SEC. 2. Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Section 24 of Chapter 561 of the Statutes of 2017, is amended to read:1002. (a) Notwithstanding As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(b)(d) Notwithstanding any other law, in there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), this section shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a). described in this section, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).(c)(e) (1) Subdivisions (a) (b) and (b) (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the an offense listed in subdivision (a) (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i) Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii).(ii) A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(e)(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.SEC. 2.Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:1002.(a)Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1)An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2)An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3)An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4)An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(b)Notwithstanding any other law, in a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), a court shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a).(c)Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the offense listed in subdivision (a) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(e)An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California may investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.SEC. 3.Section 1002.5 is added to the Code of Civil Procedure, to read:1002.5.(a)As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1)Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental hazard that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death.(2)Defective product means a product that may be defective because of a defect in manufacturing, or design, or a failure to adequately warn the consumer of a hazard involved in the foreseeable use of the product, where the defect may result in bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(3)Environmental hazard means a release of a hazardous substance that poses a threat to public health or safety involving danger of death, bodily injury, or health disability to human beings exposed to hazardous substance release.(4)Independent finding means a finding by the court based solely on the courts review of the law as applied to the facts of the case, and not based in whole or in part on a stipulation of the parties to keep information secret or arguments in support of a stipulation to keep information secret.(5)Personally identifiable information includes the following:(A)The identity of, or personal information about, victims of harm, including children and victims of abuse.(B)Personal contact information of corporate officers or board members, or information relating to any individuals finances, medical history, health, or similar information.(b)Notwithstanding any other law, in any civil action in which the pleadings state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, an agreement between the parties that restricts the disclosure of information relating to that danger shall be void as contrary to public policy and shall not be enforced by a court or tribunal unless the agreement is entered by the court pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c). This subdivision does not prohibit parties from keeping confidential the settlement amount.(c)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), in any civil action in which the pleadings state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety caused by a defective product or environmental hazard, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to that danger shall not be restricted, and a court shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that does any of the following:(A)Restricts the disclosure of information about the danger.(B)Approves a settlement agreement that would restrict the disclosure of information about the danger.(C)Restricts access to court records containing information about the danger.(2)A court may enter an order otherwise prohibited by this subdivision if it finds that either of the following conditions is satisfied:(A)The pleadings do not state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety.(B)The presumption in favor of disclosure of the information is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest in maintaining the confidentiality of the information or records and the order does not restrict any more information than is necessary to protect that interest. A court shall not base this finding on the existence of a stipulation to keep the information secret.(3)A party who is the proponent for the entry of an order under paragraph (2) has the burden of proof in obtaining the order. The proponent, in his or her request for the order, shall set forth with particularity the specific information for which protection is sought, the specific and overriding interest necessitating confidentiality, such as that the information relates to a current proprietary customer list, or that the information is a trade secret that would give the proponents competitors valuable proprietary information if revealed.(d)This section does not apply to or affect any of the following:(1)The confidentiality of preagreement negotiations, settlement discussions between mediation participants pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1115) of Division 9 of the Evidence Code, or of evidence protected by Section 1153.5 or 1154 of the Evidence Code.(2)Actions relating to a business dispute, including actions for breach of contract, in which all the parties are business entities.(3)A trade secret, as defined in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code. A trade secret does not include information or records about a product that is defective, hazardous, or unlikely to be used by a competitor to the proponents competitive disadvantage.(4)Personally identifiable information.(e)An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that violates subdivision (b) may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California may investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention. This section does not prevent an attorney for a party from requesting an order under paragraph (2) of subdivision (c).(f)This section does not eliminate or supplant existing legal standards governing protective orders, the sealing of court records, or confidential settlements, but, rather, imposes additional requirements that must be independently satisfied.(g)A person, including a representative of the news media, may bring an action to contest a confidentiality provision in a final order, judgment, or written settlement agreement that violates this section in the court in which the case was filed, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:(1)The person makes a prima facie case that the order or settlement restricts information concerning a danger to public health or safety.(2)Public knowledge of the information will decrease the likelihood of harm caused by the danger to public health or safety.(3)The action contesting the confidentiality provision will not delay or prejudice the rights of the parties to the underlying action.
4241
4342 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4443
4544 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4645
4746 SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to better protect Californians from death or substantial injury caused by any danger to the public health or safety, including defective products and environmental hazards, by creating a presumption against secrecy that protects the openness of information acquired through discovery. This presumption is to apply to settlement and confidentiality agreements, whether or not filed with the court, and to all stipulations for protective orders that would limit the disclosure of information acquired through discovery.
4847
4948 SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to better protect Californians from death or substantial injury caused by any danger to the public health or safety, including defective products and environmental hazards, by creating a presumption against secrecy that protects the openness of information acquired through discovery. This presumption is to apply to settlement and confidentiality agreements, whether or not filed with the court, and to all stipulations for protective orders that would limit the disclosure of information acquired through discovery.
5049
5150 SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to better protect Californians from death or substantial injury caused by any danger to the public health or safety, including defective products and environmental hazards, by creating a presumption against secrecy that protects the openness of information acquired through discovery. This presumption is to apply to settlement and confidentiality agreements, whether or not filed with the court, and to all stipulations for protective orders that would limit the disclosure of information acquired through discovery.
5251
5352 ### SECTION 1.
5453
55-SEC. 2. Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Section 24 of Chapter 561 of the Statutes of 2017, is amended to read:1002. (a) As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Protective order means an order issued by a judge that prevents the disclosure or dissemination of confidential information within documents that are obtained during discovery or in the course of litigation, including an order requiring a party to return documents to an opposing party at the end of the litigation.(2)(3) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage. has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact action for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(d) Notwithstanding any other law, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in this sectionsubdivision (b) or (c) shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an a protective order that restricts the disclosure of information described in this section, those subdivisions, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e). This subdivision does not prevent a court from issuing a protective order if the documents or information sought to be covered by the order include trade secrets or proprietary information.(e) (1) Subdivisions (b) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of an offense listed in subdivision (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i)Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii). a protective order. The order shall be narrowly tailored and narrowly construed. A court is not obligated to review any documents that are subject to a requested protective order if the moving party attests, under penalty of perjury, that the documents do not contain evidence showing that the party responsible for the product or condition knows or should know that the product or condition is an ongoing danger to the public health or safety. If the party moving for a protective order does not attest to this fact, the court may refuse to issue the order or may hold a hearing requiring the moving party to show good cause as to why the protective order should be issued without the attestation.(ii)A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
54+SEC. 2. Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Section 24 of Chapter 561 of the Statutes of 2017, is amended to read:1002. (a) Notwithstanding As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(b)(d) Notwithstanding any other law, in there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), this section shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a). described in this section, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).(c)(e) (1) Subdivisions (a) (b) and (b) (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the an offense listed in subdivision (a) (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i) Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii).(ii) A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(e)(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
5655
5756 SEC. 2. Section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Section 24 of Chapter 561 of the Statutes of 2017, is amended to read:
5857
5958 ### SEC. 2.
6059
61-1002. (a) As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Protective order means an order issued by a judge that prevents the disclosure or dissemination of confidential information within documents that are obtained during discovery or in the course of litigation, including an order requiring a party to return documents to an opposing party at the end of the litigation.(2)(3) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage. has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact action for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(d) Notwithstanding any other law, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in this sectionsubdivision (b) or (c) shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an a protective order that restricts the disclosure of information described in this section, those subdivisions, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e). This subdivision does not prevent a court from issuing a protective order if the documents or information sought to be covered by the order include trade secrets or proprietary information.(e) (1) Subdivisions (b) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of an offense listed in subdivision (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i)Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii). a protective order. The order shall be narrowly tailored and narrowly construed. A court is not obligated to review any documents that are subject to a requested protective order if the moving party attests, under penalty of perjury, that the documents do not contain evidence showing that the party responsible for the product or condition knows or should know that the product or condition is an ongoing danger to the public health or safety. If the party moving for a protective order does not attest to this fact, the court may refuse to issue the order or may hold a hearing requiring the moving party to show good cause as to why the protective order should be issued without the attestation.(ii)A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
60+1002. (a) Notwithstanding As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(b)(d) Notwithstanding any other law, in there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), this section shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a). described in this section, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).(c)(e) (1) Subdivisions (a) (b) and (b) (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the an offense listed in subdivision (a) (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i) Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii).(ii) A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(e)(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
6261
63-1002. (a) As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Protective order means an order issued by a judge that prevents the disclosure or dissemination of confidential information within documents that are obtained during discovery or in the course of litigation, including an order requiring a party to return documents to an opposing party at the end of the litigation.(2)(3) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage. has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact action for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(d) Notwithstanding any other law, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in this sectionsubdivision (b) or (c) shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an a protective order that restricts the disclosure of information described in this section, those subdivisions, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e). This subdivision does not prevent a court from issuing a protective order if the documents or information sought to be covered by the order include trade secrets or proprietary information.(e) (1) Subdivisions (b) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of an offense listed in subdivision (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i)Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii). a protective order. The order shall be narrowly tailored and narrowly construed. A court is not obligated to review any documents that are subject to a requested protective order if the moving party attests, under penalty of perjury, that the documents do not contain evidence showing that the party responsible for the product or condition knows or should know that the product or condition is an ongoing danger to the public health or safety. If the party moving for a protective order does not attest to this fact, the court may refuse to issue the order or may hold a hearing requiring the moving party to show good cause as to why the protective order should be issued without the attestation.(ii)A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
62+1002. (a) Notwithstanding As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(b)(d) Notwithstanding any other law, in there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), this section shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a). described in this section, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).(c)(e) (1) Subdivisions (a) (b) and (b) (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the an offense listed in subdivision (a) (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i) Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii).(ii) A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(e)(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
6463
65-1002. (a) As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Protective order means an order issued by a judge that prevents the disclosure or dissemination of confidential information within documents that are obtained during discovery or in the course of litigation, including an order requiring a party to return documents to an opposing party at the end of the litigation.(2)(3) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage. has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact action for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(d) Notwithstanding any other law, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in this sectionsubdivision (b) or (c) shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an a protective order that restricts the disclosure of information described in this section, those subdivisions, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e). This subdivision does not prevent a court from issuing a protective order if the documents or information sought to be covered by the order include trade secrets or proprietary information.(e) (1) Subdivisions (b) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of an offense listed in subdivision (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i)Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii). a protective order. The order shall be narrowly tailored and narrowly construed. A court is not obligated to review any documents that are subject to a requested protective order if the moving party attests, under penalty of perjury, that the documents do not contain evidence showing that the party responsible for the product or condition knows or should know that the product or condition is an ongoing danger to the public health or safety. If the party moving for a protective order does not attest to this fact, the court may refuse to issue the order or may hold a hearing requiring the moving party to show good cause as to why the protective order should be issued without the attestation.(ii)A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
64+1002. (a) Notwithstanding As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:(1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.(2) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage.(b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:(1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.(2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.(3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.(4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.(b)(d) Notwithstanding any other law, in there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), this section shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a). described in this section, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).(c)(e) (1) Subdivisions (a) (b) and (b) (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the an offense listed in subdivision (a) (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.(2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):(A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.(B) The amount of a settlement.(C) (i) Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii).(ii) A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.(e)(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
6665
6766
6867
69-1002. (a) As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
68+1002. (a) Notwithstanding As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
7069
7170 (1) Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental condition that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death to one or more persons.
7271
73-(2) Protective order means an order issued by a judge that prevents the disclosure or dissemination of confidential information within documents that are obtained during discovery or in the course of litigation, including an order requiring a party to return documents to an opposing party at the end of the litigation.
74-
75-(2)
76-
77-
78-
79-(3) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage. has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code.
72+(2) Trade secret means a partys proprietary information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process. Trade secret does not mean information or records that concern a defective, hazardous, or obsolete product or environmental condition or that are unlikely to be used to a competitors economic advantage.
8073
8174 (b) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:
8275
8376 (1) An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.
8477
8578 (2) An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.
8679
8780 (3) An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.
8881
8982 (4) An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
9083
91-(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact action for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.
84+(c) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of fact for civil damages regarding a defective product or environmental condition that poses a danger to public health or safety.
9285
93-(d) Notwithstanding any other law, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in this sectionsubdivision (b) or (c) shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an a protective order that restricts the disclosure of information described in this section, those subdivisions, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e). This subdivision does not prevent a court from issuing a protective order if the documents or information sought to be covered by the order include trade secrets or proprietary information.
86+(b)
9487
95-(e) (1) Subdivisions (b) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of an offense listed in subdivision (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.
88+
89+
90+(d) Notwithstanding any other law, in there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), this section shall not be restricted, and a court or arbitral tribunal shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a). described in this section, except as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).
91+
92+(c)
93+
94+
95+
96+(e) (1) Subdivisions (a) (b) and (b) (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the an offense listed in subdivision (a) (b) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision paragraph shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.
9697
9798 (2) Subdivisions (c) and (d) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any of the following relating to a cause of action described in subdivision (c):
9899
99100 (A) Medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding a person injured by a defective product or environmental condition.
100101
101102 (B) The amount of a settlement.
102103
103-(C) (i)Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii). a protective order. The order shall be narrowly tailored and narrowly construed. A court is not obligated to review any documents that are subject to a requested protective order if the moving party attests, under penalty of perjury, that the documents do not contain evidence showing that the party responsible for the product or condition knows or should know that the product or condition is an ongoing danger to the public health or safety. If the party moving for a protective order does not attest to this fact, the court may refuse to issue the order or may hold a hearing requiring the moving party to show good cause as to why the protective order should be issued without the attestation.
104+(C) (i) Information relating to a current, proprietary customer list or a trade secret, if the party seeking to prevent its disclosure moves the court or arbitral tribunal for an order of nondisclosure and the order is granted pursuant to clause (ii).
104105
105106 (ii) A court or arbitral tribunal may grant an order of nondisclosure if the moving party demonstrates that the presumption in favor of disclosure is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest. The order shall be narrowly tailored to restrict no more information than necessary to protect the interest, and it shall be narrowly construed.
106107
108+(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a
107109
108110
109-(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.
111+
112+(f) (1) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) (b) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.
110113
111114 (2) A provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (c) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2019, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.
112115
113-(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
116+(e)
117+
118+
119+
120+(g) An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) subdivisions (b) and (c) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) this section as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California shall investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
121+
122+
123+
124+
125+
126+(a)Notwithstanding any other law, a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action is prohibited in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for civil damages for any of the following:
127+
128+
129+
130+(1)An act that may be prosecuted as a felony sex offense.
131+
132+
133+
134+(2)An act of childhood sexual abuse, as defined in Section 340.1.
135+
136+
137+
138+(3)An act of sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code, or conduct prohibited with respect to a minor pursuant to Section 311.1, 311.5, or 311.6 of the Penal Code.
139+
140+
141+
142+(4)An act of sexual assault, as defined in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (e) of Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, against an elder or dependent adult, as defined in Sections 15610.23 and 15610.27 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
143+
144+
145+
146+(b)Notwithstanding any other law, in a civil action described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a), a court shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that restricts the disclosure of information in a manner that conflicts with subdivision (a).
147+
148+
149+
150+(c)Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not preclude an agreement preventing the disclosure of any medical information or personal identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 530.55 of the Penal Code, regarding the victim of the offense listed in subdivision (a) or of any information revealing the nature of the relationship between the victim and the defendant. This subdivision shall not be construed to limit the right of a crime victim to disclose this information.
151+
152+
153+
154+(d)Except as authorized by subdivision (c), a provision within a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) that is entered into on or after January 1, 2017, is void as a matter of law and against public policy.
155+
156+
157+
158+(e)An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of factual information related to the action described in subdivision (a) that is not otherwise authorized by subdivision (c) as a condition of settlement, or advising a client to sign an agreement that includes such a provision, may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California may investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention.
159+
160+
161+
162+
163+
164+
165+
166+(a)As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
167+
168+
169+
170+(1)Danger to the public health or safety means a defective product or environmental hazard that has caused or is likely to cause repeated significant or substantial bodily injury or death.
171+
172+
173+
174+(2)Defective product means a product that may be defective because of a defect in manufacturing, or design, or a failure to adequately warn the consumer of a hazard involved in the foreseeable use of the product, where the defect may result in bodily injury or death to one or more persons.
175+
176+
177+
178+(3)Environmental hazard means a release of a hazardous substance that poses a threat to public health or safety involving danger of death, bodily injury, or health disability to human beings exposed to hazardous substance release.
179+
180+
181+
182+(4)Independent finding means a finding by the court based solely on the courts review of the law as applied to the facts of the case, and not based in whole or in part on a stipulation of the parties to keep information secret or arguments in support of a stipulation to keep information secret.
183+
184+
185+
186+(5)Personally identifiable information includes the following:
187+
188+
189+
190+(A)The identity of, or personal information about, victims of harm, including children and victims of abuse.
191+
192+
193+
194+(B)Personal contact information of corporate officers or board members, or information relating to any individuals finances, medical history, health, or similar information.
195+
196+
197+
198+(b)Notwithstanding any other law, in any civil action in which the pleadings state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety, an agreement between the parties that restricts the disclosure of information relating to that danger shall be void as contrary to public policy and shall not be enforced by a court or tribunal unless the agreement is entered by the court pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c). This subdivision does not prohibit parties from keeping confidential the settlement amount.
199+
200+
201+
202+(c)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), in any civil action in which the pleadings state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety caused by a defective product or environmental hazard, there shall be a presumption that disclosure of information relating to that danger shall not be restricted, and a court shall not enter, by stipulation or otherwise, an order that does any of the following:
203+
204+
205+
206+(A)Restricts the disclosure of information about the danger.
207+
208+
209+
210+(B)Approves a settlement agreement that would restrict the disclosure of information about the danger.
211+
212+
213+
214+(C)Restricts access to court records containing information about the danger.
215+
216+
217+
218+(2)A court may enter an order otherwise prohibited by this subdivision if it finds that either of the following conditions is satisfied:
219+
220+
221+
222+(A)The pleadings do not state facts relevant to the existence of a danger to the public health or safety.
223+
224+
225+
226+(B)The presumption in favor of disclosure of the information is clearly outweighed by a specific and substantial overriding interest in maintaining the confidentiality of the information or records and the order does not restrict any more information than is necessary to protect that interest. A court shall not base this finding on the existence of a stipulation to keep the information secret.
227+
228+
229+
230+(3)A party who is the proponent for the entry of an order under paragraph (2) has the burden of proof in obtaining the order. The proponent, in his or her request for the order, shall set forth with particularity the specific information for which protection is sought, the specific and overriding interest necessitating confidentiality, such as that the information relates to a current proprietary customer list, or that the information is a trade secret that would give the proponents competitors valuable proprietary information if revealed.
231+
232+
233+
234+(d)This section does not apply to or affect any of the following:
235+
236+
237+
238+(1)The confidentiality of preagreement negotiations, settlement discussions between mediation participants pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1115) of Division 9 of the Evidence Code, or of evidence protected by Section 1153.5 or 1154 of the Evidence Code.
239+
240+
241+
242+(2)Actions relating to a business dispute, including actions for breach of contract, in which all the parties are business entities.
243+
244+
245+
246+(3)A trade secret, as defined in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code. A trade secret does not include information or records about a product that is defective, hazardous, or unlikely to be used by a competitor to the proponents competitive disadvantage.
247+
248+
249+
250+(4)Personally identifiable information.
251+
252+
253+
254+(e)An attorneys failure to comply with the requirements of this section by demanding that a provision be included in a settlement agreement that violates subdivision (b) may be grounds for professional discipline and the State Bar of California may investigate and take appropriate action in any such case brought to its attention. This section does not prevent an attorney for a party from requesting an order under paragraph (2) of subdivision (c).
255+
256+
257+
258+(f)This section does not eliminate or supplant existing legal standards governing protective orders, the sealing of court records, or confidential settlements, but, rather, imposes additional requirements that must be independently satisfied.
259+
260+
261+
262+(g)A person, including a representative of the news media, may bring an action to contest a confidentiality provision in a final order, judgment, or written settlement agreement that violates this section in the court in which the case was filed, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
263+
264+
265+
266+(1)The person makes a prima facie case that the order or settlement restricts information concerning a danger to public health or safety.
267+
268+
269+
270+(2)Public knowledge of the information will decrease the likelihood of harm caused by the danger to public health or safety.
271+
272+
273+
274+(3)The action contesting the confidentiality provision will not delay or prejudice the rights of the parties to the underlying action.