The amendment proposed in AB922 is largely nonsubstantive, which means it does not introduce new regulations or substantially change existing laws. By focusing on procedural violations that do not have environmental repercussions, the bill acknowledges existing protocols without imposing additional burdens on forest operations. The implications for state law primarily revolve around clarifying what constitutes an infraction related to procedural requirements and ensuring that the enforcement mechanisms remain efficient and straightforward.
Summary
Assembly Bill No. 922, introduced by Assembly Member Dahle, aims to amend Section 4601.4 of the Public Resources Code, which governs forest practices in California. The Zberg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973 sets out regulations requiring timber operations to have a timber harvesting plan prepared by a registered professional forester, which must be submitted to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection prior to any timber operations. AB922 seeks to clarify the procedures regarding violations of these regulatory requirements, particularly emphasizing procedural infractions that do not result in any environmental damage.
Contention
While the bill itself is framed as a minor amendment, there may be underlying tensions related to the enforcement of forestry regulations. Some stakeholders might fear that even minor legislative changes could inadvertently lead to lax enforcement of environmentally crucial practices if not carefully monitored. Any changes to the Zberg-Nejedly Act have the potential to become points of contention among environmentalists and industry representatives who may have differing views on the necessity and rigor of the regulations governing timber operations.
An Act Concerning The Forest Practices Advisory Board And Grace Periods For The Renewal Of Certain Professional Certifications Issued By The Commissioner Of Energy And Environmental Protection.