California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB957

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Report Pass
5/2/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
6/26/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Refer
7/10/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
10/11/17  
Chaptered
10/11/17  
Passed
10/11/17  

Caption

Higher education regional workforce coordination: California Workforce Development Board.

Impact

The implementation of AB 957 is expected to create significant changes in how workforce development is approached in California. By integrating higher education institutions into regional workforce planning conversations, the legislation seeks to facilitate partnerships that can drive improvements in employment rates and skills matching within the local economies. Furthermore, CSU and UC are required to report their progress to the Legislature, which will help gauge the effectiveness of such programs and provide transparency in handling education-to-employment pipelines.

Summary

AB 957, introduced by Assemblymember Levine, focuses on enhancing cooperation between California's higher education institutions and regional workforce needs, specifically aligning education outcomes with market demands. The bill mandates the California State University (CSU) system to engage actively in regional discussions under the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, while it requests the University of California (UC) to participate as well. By strengthening these ties, the bill aims to ensure that educational institutions are effectively preparing students for high-demand sectors and facilitating smoother transitions into the workforce.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 957 appears to be positive among stakeholders in the workforce and education sectors. Advocates commend the bill for recognizing the importance of aligning educational systems with economic needs. However, there is also caution expressed regarding implementation effectiveness and ensuring that the voices of various local communities are adequately represented in these discussions, which may lead to concerns about a one-size-fits-all approach to educational programs versus localized adaptations.

Contention

While most discussions around the bill have been constructive, some concerns have arisen about how the bill's requirements might impact the autonomy of individual campuses within the CSU and UC systems. Critics argue that by mandating participation in regional conversations, the institutions may face challenges in tailoring their educational programs to meet unique local needs. The balance between state directives and local governance remains a point of contention that needs careful consideration as AB 957 moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1013

Persons with convictions: Board of State and Community Corrections: California Workforce Development Board: local workforce development boards.

CA SB396

Employment: gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation.

CA AB2207

State boards and commissions: representatives of older adults.

CA AB820

State boards and commissions: seniors.

CA AB2342

Community Economic Resilience Fund Program.

CA SB21

Single-room occupancy units: demolition and replacement: housing assistance programs: eligibility for homeless individuals and families.

CA AB235

Apprenticeship and preapprenticeship.