California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB983

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  

Caption

Memorial: California Indigenous People Capitol Memorial Committee.

Impact

The passage of AB 983 would signify an important legislative acknowledgment of the indigenous peoples of California and their historical importance in the region. The memorial is intended to be a site of reflection and education, offering a physical space dedicated to the indigenous cultures and histories that have shaped California. Moreover, the bill outlines that the planning, construction, and maintenance of the memorial shall be funded exclusively through private donations, thereby underscoring the role of community support in fostering civic engagement and cultural preservation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 983, introduced by Assembly Member Frazier, aims to establish a California Indigenous People Capitol Memorial within the State Capitol grounds. The bill mandates the creation of a designated working group, the California Indigenous People Capitol Memorial Committee, which will oversee the planning and construction of the memorial. This committee will be composed of various stakeholders, including representatives from tribal nations, state-appointed officials, and individuals with historical connections to California's indigenous peoples. The intent of this legislation is to foster recognition and remembrance of the contributions and heritage of indigenous communities in California.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 983 appears to be supportive, particularly among indigenous advocates and community leaders who view the establishment of the memorial as a step towards greater recognition and justice for historical injustices faced by indigenous populations. However, there may be a degree of contention regarding the sources of funding and the role of government in the memorial's maintenance. Some advocates may express concerns about ensuring that the memorial authentically reflects indigenous voices and perspectives.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the reliance on private funding for the memorial's construction and maintenance. Critics may argue that this approach could potentially limit the project's scope or affect its sustainability. Additionally, there are concerns about ensuring that the memorial adequately represents the diverse histories and cultures of California's indigenous peoples, as there is a rich tapestry of tribes and histories within the state. Establishing a memorial that honors all perspectives and contributions may present challenges requiring careful consideration and consultation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2036

State Capitol: Mervyn M. Dymally bust.

CA AB298

Honoring Our Blind Veterans Act.

CA AB1762

State Capitol: Gold Star Families monument.

CA SB463

State Capitol Park: California Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) Civil Rights Monument.

CA AB338

State Capitol grounds.

CA SB1407

State Capitol: victims and survivors of communism monument.

CA AB1452

State Capitol: Iraq Afghanistan Kuwait Veterans Memorial monument.

CA SB537

City or County of Los Angeles: memorial to forcibly deported Mexican Americans and Mexican immigrants.