University of California: student tuition and fee increases.
Impact
The measure draws attention to significant financial management concerns within the UC system. Historical data cited in the resolution reveals that tuition and fees have risen over 100 percent since the 2005-2006 academic year. Furthermore, it references a 2017 audit that criticized UC leadership for neglecting their fiscal responsibilities, notably by utilizing resources for excessive salaries and expenditures, rather than focusing on student affordability. This resolution, if endorsed by the Regents, could provide some relief to students pressed by financial constraints.
Summary
ACR 167 is a resolution introduced by Assembly Members Acosta and Baker urging the Regents of the University of California (UC) to reject proposed increases in tuition and student service fees. Specifically, the bill addresses an increase of 2.7 percent, translating to an additional $342 per academic year for students, which would bring total tuition and fees to $12,972 for the 2018-2019 academic year. The resolution highlights concerns regarding the financial burden that these increases would place on students, particularly in the context of already rising costs over the past decade.
Contention
The resolution raises broader questions about the UC's financial governance, particularly as it relates to the substantial reserve funds reported by the UC Office of the President. The audit pointed to instances of perceived financial mismanagement, including extravagant spending on non-essential perks, which stakeholders believe undermine the legitimacy of the proposed tuition hikes. Proponents of ACR 167 argue that rejecting the fee increases is critical for economic equity and access to education, as it reflects an urgent need for more responsible financial practices within the UC system.