The adoption of ACR278 signifies a legislative intent to raise awareness of PACE and its benefits, reinforcing support for programs that maintain the well-being and independence of elderly individuals. This resolution does not change laws but draws attention to existing provisions that enable coordinated care under Medicare and Medi-Cal, which could inspire further legislative efforts to improve or expand PACE. Advocacy for programs like PACE presents an opportunity for California to address growing eldercare needs amid an increasing senior population.
Summary
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 278 (ACR278) seeks to recognize September 2018 as PACE Month in California, highlighting the importance of the Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). The measure emphasizes the needs of frail elderly and disabled adults aged 55 and older, a demographic that is growing and significantly impacting health care costs. ACR278 also celebrates the comprehensive, integrated approach of the PACE model, which allows eligible individuals to receive coordinated medical services while remaining in their communities, rather than in institutional settings.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding ACR278 appears to be positive, focusing on care and support for vulnerable populations. Supporters appreciate the recognition of PACE Month as a means to promote understanding and awareness of elderly care challenges and solutions. This highlights a collective acknowledgment of the responsibility to care for an aging population, positively framing PACE as an effective model for elderly care that empowers individuals to live independently.
Contention
While ACR278 does not seem to have significant points of contention in itself, it may bring attention to broader discussions regarding healthcare funding, access, and the need for more comprehensive solutions for elderly care. The resolution indirectly invites lawmakers and the public to consider the adequacy of current support systems for the elderly and to address any gaps in services that may exist within the PACE framework, thus provoking dialogue on the state’s responsibility to its aging citizens.