California Assembly Bill AJR22

California 2017-2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 8/21/17
• Refer: 8/24/17
• Report Pass: 8/29/17
• Refer: 8/30/17
• Engrossed: 9/7/17
• Refer: 9/8/17
• Enrolled: 9/15/17
• Chaptered: 9/25/17
• Passed: 9/25/17

Caption

Transgender service members.

Impact

The resolution calls on the Governor of California to direct the state’s military forces to refrain from enforcing any discriminatory directives against transgender individuals, thus maintaining existing policies that allow them to serve. By doing so, AJR 22 seeks to create an environment where transgender individuals are treated equally within the military, aligning with California's broader civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in various aspects. The passage of this resolution, while symbolic, represents a firm stance against perceived federal overreach and attempts to maintain the inclusion of all qualified Americans in military service.

Summary

Assembly Joint Resolution No. 22 (AJR 22) addresses the controversial issue of military service for transgender individuals in the United States. The resolution was introduced in response to President Donald Trump's announcement that transgender individuals would be banned from serving in the military. It emphasizes California's commitment to protecting civil rights and condemns any discriminatory practices against transgender service members, urging state authorities to ensure no actions are taken that would discriminate based on gender identity or expression. This proactive approach aims to maintain inclusivity within the Armed Forces and mitigate any potential fallout from federal directives that could harm transgender service members' rights.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AJR 22 is largely supportive among California legislators, with a clear message of inclusion and equality for all service members, particularly those who are transgender. The resolution reflects a contrast to the federal rhetoric at the time, showing a commitment to uphold values of diversity and equality in military service. Opinions from military leaders and advocacy groups further bolster the resolution's position, arguing against the notion that transgender individuals would hinder military effectiveness.

Contention

Key points of contention involve the debate over the necessity and implications of President Trump’s proposed ban on transgender service members, which supporters of AJR 22 vehemently oppose. Concerns have been raised about the impact of such a ban on military readiness and morale, as well as on the civil rights of those currently serving. The resolution cites studies indicating that the costs associated with transgender service members and their healthcare are minimal compared to the overall military budget, aiming to dispel myths about the financial burden that could accompany inclusive policies.