If adopted, the resolution would formally reject the provisions of the executive order limiting travel and immigration, asserting that such measures are politically motivated rather than based on genuine national security concerns. The resolution also emphasizes the importance of maintaining the U.S. commitment to sheltering those fleeing violence and persecution, particularly in light of the plight of Syrian refugees, many of whom are unable to return to their home country due to ongoing conflict. It highlights how the executive order could endanger allies who assisted U.S. military personnel and are now at risk.
Summary
House Resolution No. 15, introduced by Assembly Members Gomez and Levine, addresses the controversial executive order issued by President Trump regarding immigration and visa policies. The resolution critiques the executive order titled 'Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States,' asserting that it targets specific nationalities and religions unjustly, undermining the foundational principles of American values aimed at providing refuge from persecution. It raises concerns about the implications of this order, particularly in its discriminatory nature against lawful permanent residents and its potential to exacerbate divisions within society.
Contention
Debate around HR 15 reflects the broader national discourse on immigration policy and security. Proponents of the resolution argue for a return to more inclusive immigration practices and decry the order's divisive impacts on various communities. Conversely, supporters of the executive order often frame their stance around issues of national security and border control. This resolution represents an attempt by state legislators to assert California's position against federal policies they perceive as draconian and discriminatory, thus illustrating a significant point of contention between state and federal approaches to immigration.