Relative to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
The resolution notably condemns the rescission of DACA by the Trump administration, emphasizing the importance of immigrant rights and calling for legislative steps to create a more effective immigration system that allows for a pathway to citizenship. It highlights the contributions of undocumented immigrants to the state and national economy, including significant tax contributions. The resolution seeks not only to affirm support for DACA recipients but also to address broader immigration reform, reflecting California's commitment to inclusivity and diversity.
AR66, also known as the resolution regarding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), was introduced to address the impact of the federal immigration program on young undocumented immigrants, known as Dreamers. DACA, created by an executive order in 2012, allows undocumented individuals who arrived in the U.S. as children to apply for work permits and receive protection from deportation for renewable two-year periods. Approximately 790,000 individuals have participated in this program, with California housing the highest number of recipients, totaling over 222,000.
Sentiment around AR66 appears predominantly supportive, with many legislators, community leaders, and citizens advocating for DACA and the rights of Dreamers. Public opinion polls indicate a strong favorability towards providing permanent residency opportunities for Dreamers. While there is overall support for DACA, there are voices of contention, often from more conservative factions who view DACA as a questionable use of executive power and argue for stricter immigration controls.
Points of contention regarding the resolution largely stem from political divides over immigration policy. Supporters argue that DACA serves as a vital lifeline for young immigrants who contribute to society and the economy, whereas opponents may raise concerns about border security and the implications of extending residency and work rights to undocumented individuals. The resolution thus serves as a focal point in the ongoing debate surrounding immigration in the U.S., encapsulating both the supportive and skeptical views.