The enactment of SB 123 is significant because it establishes a baseline for budgeting practices within the state of California. By outlining the intent for statutory changes, the bill sets the stage for adjustments and reforms that may arise as the budget is finalized and executed throughout the fiscal year. This legislation provides an opportunity for legislators to revisit fiscal policies and prioritize areas of funding that require more consideration during the legislative session.
Summary
Senate Bill No. 123, known as the Budget Act of 2017, was introduced by the Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review. The primary purpose of this legislation is to express the intent of the California Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the state's budget for the year 2017. The bill serves as a framework for subsequent actions regarding state fiscal priorities and allocation of financial resources to fulfill budgetary requirements and obligations.
Contention
While SB 123 does not specify any direct appropriations or financial allocations, the intent of the bill could spark discussions regarding state spending, particularly in relation to social services, education, and infrastructure. Potential points of contention may arise as lawmakers debate the effectiveness of funding strategies and proposed changes to existing appropriations. Stakeholders and advocacy groups may raise concerns over the distribution of funds and the implications of budget adjustments on vulnerable populations or critical state programs.
A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.